2022
DOI: 10.1111/iju.15108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

External validation of yonsei nomogram predicting chronic kidney disease development after partial nephrectomy: An international, multicenter study

Abstract: AbbreviationsAKI = acute kidney injury BMI = body mass index CKD = chronic kidney disease DM = diabetes mellitus PN = partial nephrectomy PPV = positive predictive value RN = radical nephrectomy RPN = robotic partial nephrectomy WIT = warm ischemia time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(106 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this issue of the International Journal of Urology, the external validation of the Yonsei nomogram is provided, based on a multicentric dataset including 3500 patients of various ethnicities with a minimum follow‐up of 12 months (median = 47 months) 4 . CKD‐free progression probability at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years was calculated for all patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this issue of the International Journal of Urology, the external validation of the Yonsei nomogram is provided, based on a multicentric dataset including 3500 patients of various ethnicities with a minimum follow‐up of 12 months (median = 47 months) 4 . CKD‐free progression probability at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years was calculated for all patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abdel Raheem et al. conducted an external validation study of the Yonsei nomogram with 3526 patients in mostly Western countries 2 . The area under the curve value was 0.69, 0.72, 0.77, and 0.78 for the prediction of new‐onset CKD at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original MDRD equation improved the accuracy of GFR estimation in the Japanese population by a coefficient of 0.881 4 . Patients who developed new‐onset CKD were 13.1% of the original Korean cohort, whereas they were 19.4% of the external validation cohort 2 . In addition, the overestimation of eGFR in Asian patients may have caused the miss determination of patients without CKD.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%