2012
DOI: 10.3171/2012.8.jns12234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extent of resection in patients with glioblastoma: limiting factors, perception of resectability, and effect on survival

Abstract: The authors' findings confirm that tumor location affects EOR and suggest that EOR may also be influenced by the surgeon's ability to judge the presence of residual tumor during surgery. The surgeon's ability to judge completeness of resection during surgery is commonly inaccurate. The authors' study confirms the impact of EOR on 1-year survival.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
150
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 257 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
150
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although prior studies suggest that postoperative tumor volume, as well as extent of resection, have prognostic significance in newly diagnosed glioblastomas, 13,14 the importance of tumor volume in patients with recurrent tumor receiving anti-angiogenic therapy is unclear. In patients with recurrent tumor receiving bevacizumab, results from a phase 2 clinical trial have shown that 4-week posttreatment response based on 2-dimensional criteria correlates with PFS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although prior studies suggest that postoperative tumor volume, as well as extent of resection, have prognostic significance in newly diagnosed glioblastomas, 13,14 the importance of tumor volume in patients with recurrent tumor receiving anti-angiogenic therapy is unclear. In patients with recurrent tumor receiving bevacizumab, results from a phase 2 clinical trial have shown that 4-week posttreatment response based on 2-dimensional criteria correlates with PFS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have shown that gross-total resection (GTR) of contrast-enhancing tumor is achieved in only about 20%-30% of patients, and in patients deemed to have tumors amendable to GTR, and radiographic complete resection is achieved in only approximately 24% of patients. 1,3,16,24,33,35 These modest outcomes are likely due to difficulty in determining the distinction between tumor and brain parenchyma. 1 Several technological advances have been explored to aid in improving the ability to obtain greater EOR during glioma surgery: intraoperative MRI, 15 neuronavigation, 36 ultrasound, 13 and newer technologies such as Raman scattered microscopy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fluorescence guidance in resection of malignant glioma has been shown to improve extent of resection and 6-month progression-free survival in a prospective, multi-institutional clinical and preliminary experience in the United States has confirmed the high correlation of this fluorescence with imaging and histologic features [99]. Of course that the outcome of surgical treatment in patients with GBM is highly influenced by tumor topography [97], extension [10] and the actual extent of the surgical resection [78]. Moreover, the extent of surgical resection is an independent prognostic factor-an analysis of 28 studies found a mean duration of survival advantage of total over subtotal resection for glioblastoma (14 vs. 11 month) [48].…”
Section: State Of the Art In The Treatment Of Gbmmentioning
confidence: 99%