2013
DOI: 10.1097/brs.0b013e31828af21f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extensive Validation of the Pain Disability Index in 3 Groups of Patients With Musculoskeletal Pain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
107
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
9
107
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The PDI uses a scale from 0 to 10, in which greater scores indicate more severe pain-related disability [40]. The PDI is a commonly used scale and has been shown to be internally reliable (ICC = 0.86) and valid for discriminating between low and high levels of disability [4042]. Previous research has used a reduction of 9.5 points on the Pain Disability Inventory as an indicator of clinically meaningful change [4345].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PDI uses a scale from 0 to 10, in which greater scores indicate more severe pain-related disability [40]. The PDI is a commonly used scale and has been shown to be internally reliable (ICC = 0.86) and valid for discriminating between low and high levels of disability [4042]. Previous research has used a reduction of 9.5 points on the Pain Disability Inventory as an indicator of clinically meaningful change [4345].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dutch. 5 The main advantages of the PDI over other questionnaires are its brevity (7 items), applicability for varying types of pain disorders, such as specifi c, nonspecifi c pain, acute, or chronic pain, and its applicability for any body part or diagnosis. Using the PDI may enhance comparison of disability between clinical populations.…”
Section: Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjects are asked to rate disability on a numeric rating scale ranging from 0 (no disability) to 10 (maximum disability) in the areas family and home responsibilities, recreation, social activity, occupation, sexual behaviour, self-care, and life-support activity. The instrument has been tested and is considered valid and reliable for pain-related disability (Tait, Chibnall, 1990;Soer et al, 2012bSoer et al, , 2013. The Swedish version of the PDI was used for this study.…”
Section: Pain-related Disabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%