2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10822-014-9717-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extensive all-atom Monte Carlo sampling and QM/MM corrections in the SAMPL4 hydration free energy challenge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
79
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all cases, the molecules are simulated in a classical fixed-charge potential and the system is reweighted to a QM/MM Hamiltonian. A previous study using NBB showed that the QM/MM Hamiltonian provides a small but statistically significant improvement over standard MM force fields at matching experimental data [249,257,296]. We evaluate whether the magnitude of this benefit changes when different methods are used to reweight the same MM configurations to the same QM/MM Hamiltonian.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Outlookmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In all cases, the molecules are simulated in a classical fixed-charge potential and the system is reweighted to a QM/MM Hamiltonian. A previous study using NBB showed that the QM/MM Hamiltonian provides a small but statistically significant improvement over standard MM force fields at matching experimental data [249,257,296]. We evaluate whether the magnitude of this benefit changes when different methods are used to reweight the same MM configurations to the same QM/MM Hamiltonian.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Outlookmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The simplest method to obtain free energy differences via Hamiltonian reweighting involves reweighting from one sampled to one unsampled state, generally referred to as exponential reweighting or the Zwanzig equation [191,238,240,[242][243][244][247][248][249][250]252], which is simply eq 6.1. This method produces asymptotically unbiased free energy differences in the limit of large sampling.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations