2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.nds.2014.04.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extension of TALYS to 1 GeV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The upper energy limit is determined by the fact that the EKM and EMN chiral potentials are able to describe NN scattering observables up to 300 MeV [17,[19][20][21]. The phenomenological global KD potential was originally constructed for energies up to 200 MeV [10] and it was then extended up to 1 GeV [11]. It can therefore be interesting to test and compare the validity of the predictions Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The upper energy limit is determined by the fact that the EKM and EMN chiral potentials are able to describe NN scattering observables up to 300 MeV [17,[19][20][21]. The phenomenological global KD potential was originally constructed for energies up to 200 MeV [10] and it was then extended up to 1 GeV [11]. It can therefore be interesting to test and compare the validity of the predictions Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2] from different chiral potentials at N 4 LO and of the successful phenomenological OP of Refs. [10,11] in comparison with available data for the observables of elastic proton scattering on different isotopic chains, located in different areas of the nuclear chart. Results are presented for several proton energies around and above 200…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present data are shown in Figs. 1-10 in comparison with EXFOR database [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] data and with evaluated data from the EAF 2007 [18] and TENDL 2014 [19] libraries. All evaluated data are corrected/normalized to the natural abundance of the sample.…”
Section: D+znmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1-10. They are compared to the results of previous authors [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] and to the evaluated data from EAF 2007 [15] and TENDL 2014 [16] libraries. All evaluated data are corrected/normalized to natural abundance of the sample…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%