2002
DOI: 10.1080/11956860.2002.11682706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extending community ecology to landscapes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
82
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
82
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…v www.esajournals.org larly, by including a geographic distance matrix in the partial Mantel tests, we tested for a correlation between variables after accounting for the potential influence of spatial autocorrelation (Urban et al 2002). We used Euclidian distance matrices for the response variables, the standardized environmental variables, and the GPS coordinates of the plots.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…v www.esajournals.org larly, by including a geographic distance matrix in the partial Mantel tests, we tested for a correlation between variables after accounting for the potential influence of spatial autocorrelation (Urban et al 2002). We used Euclidian distance matrices for the response variables, the standardized environmental variables, and the GPS coordinates of the plots.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used partial Mantel tests to examine group membership as predicted by the environmental variables while controlling for spatial autocorrelation (Urban et al 2002). Tests of these forms help answer questions like 'Are species that are in the same groups also found in similar environments?'…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This test determines whether the distance between species in ordination space corresponds to the distance between groups, thereby highlighting the among-to within-group contrast. In theory, there is an optimal number of groups that maximizes the correlation between these distances (Urban et al 2002). To estimate this maximum correlation, we iterated over all possible numbers of groups, i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations