2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2018.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expression profiles of defense genes in cassava storage roots upon exposure to Phytopythium sp., causal agent of soft root rot disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some previous reports have shown that resistance to cassava root rot has a polygenic character [ 23 , 55 ]. Quantitative resistance is controlled by multiple minor genes on the plant, thereby promoting partial resistance to the pathogen and a decrease in the severity of symptoms and/or the progression of epidemics over time [ 56 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some previous reports have shown that resistance to cassava root rot has a polygenic character [ 23 , 55 ]. Quantitative resistance is controlled by multiple minor genes on the plant, thereby promoting partial resistance to the pathogen and a decrease in the severity of symptoms and/or the progression of epidemics over time [ 56 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall understanding of the genetic mechanisms responsible for the various levels of resistance to root rot disease in field conditions among cassava genotypes remains underexplored. The studies developed to date have focused on searching for sources of resistance [ 10 , 20 ] and identifying the possible genes involved in defense mechanisms [ 23 , 55 ] using the in vitro methodology of root inoculation. However, in order to characterize the disease and the behavior of cassava genotypes in the field, it is necessary to consider the different defense mechanisms not only of the root system tissues, but also the shoot yields of the genotypes used in planting [ 29 , 46 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation