2015
DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2014-102671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exposure–response relationships for select cancer and non-cancer health outcomes in a cohort of US firefighters from San Francisco, Chicago and Philadelphia (1950–2009)

Abstract: Objectives To examine exposure–response relationships between surrogates of firefighting exposure and select outcomes among previously studied US career firefighters. Methods Eight cancer and four non-cancer outcomes were examined using conditional logistic regression. Incidence density sampling was used to match each case to 200 controls on attained age. Days accrued in firefighting assignments (exposed-days), run totals (fire-runs) and run times (fire-hours) were used as exposure surrogates. HRs comparing … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
96
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
96
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, for the purposes of analysis, we assumed that the excess risk for the cancers analyzed is indeed caused by participation in the firefighter occupation (rather than genetics or some other exposure). The strongest evidence to date comes from Daniels, Bertke, et al, 2015, which looked at the incidence of cancer among career firefighters who were more and less exposed to fires, thus accounting for the fact that firefighters might have different characteristics from those in the general population (importantly, smoking prevalence and other lifestyle characteristics were not available in the data for these publications). If firefighting causes cancer, we should expect those who fight more fires to have higher cancer incidence.…”
Section: Approach For Estimating the Economic Benefit Of Firefightingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Nonetheless, for the purposes of analysis, we assumed that the excess risk for the cancers analyzed is indeed caused by participation in the firefighter occupation (rather than genetics or some other exposure). The strongest evidence to date comes from Daniels, Bertke, et al, 2015, which looked at the incidence of cancer among career firefighters who were more and less exposed to fires, thus accounting for the fact that firefighters might have different characteristics from those in the general population (importantly, smoking prevalence and other lifestyle characteristics were not available in the data for these publications). If firefighting causes cancer, we should expect those who fight more fires to have higher cancer incidence.…”
Section: Approach For Estimating the Economic Benefit Of Firefightingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If firefighting causes cancer, we should expect those who fight more fires to have higher cancer incidence. Daniels, Bertke, et al, 2015, describes a higher incidence of lung cancer among more-exposed firefighters but does not find strong associations with many other types of cancers. Many experts in the field believe that the strongest evidence for a direct link between firefighting and cancer is mesothelioma, which showed a twofold increase in incidence in the original Daniels, Kubale, et al, 2014 study.…”
Section: Approach For Estimating the Economic Benefit Of Firefightingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations