2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2013.02.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exposing cells to H2O2: A quantitative comparison between continuous low-dose and one-time high-dose treatments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
73
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have used this approach because we believe that such delivery of H 2 O 2 is more relevant from a pathophysiological standpoint, than sudden 'bursts' of authentic extracellular H 2 O 2 [44,45]. According to prior studies, low concentrations of glucose oxidase induce secondary alterations in intracellular pathways, including depletion of intracellular antioxidants, deterioration of mitochondrial membrane potential, and the impairment of mitochondrial electron transport, culminating in a secondary production of ROS from endogenous sources [4649].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have used this approach because we believe that such delivery of H 2 O 2 is more relevant from a pathophysiological standpoint, than sudden 'bursts' of authentic extracellular H 2 O 2 [44,45]. According to prior studies, low concentrations of glucose oxidase induce secondary alterations in intracellular pathways, including depletion of intracellular antioxidants, deterioration of mitochondrial membrane potential, and the impairment of mitochondrial electron transport, culminating in a secondary production of ROS from endogenous sources [4649].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wells were treated with 2.5 ml of 10 lM PL, PEITC, or 100 lM of BSO for a period of 10 h. After treatment, the cells were trypsinized, washed once with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), followed by resuspension in 2 ml of 100 mM MMTS to convert sulfhydryl groups to -S-CH 3 . to prevent oxidation artifacts (44). The MMTS cell suspension was placed on ice for 20 min, followed by two more PBS washes.…”
Section: Immunoblotting For Prx-2 Oxidationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This system has been used to induce hypoxia in solutions and in microfluidic devices (Askoxylakis et al, 2011;Baumann et al, 2008;Huang et al, 2013;Li et al, 2016;Millonig et al, 2009;Mueller et al, 2009;Rajan et al, 2013;Sobotta et al, 2013;Zitta et al, 2012). The use of GOX/CAT is beneficial in that the system provides a rapid onset of hypoxia (usually within a few minutes) (Askoxylakis et al, 2011;Baumann et al, 2008;Huang et al, 2013;Li et al, 2016;Millonig et al, 2009;Mueller et al, 2009;Rajan et al, 2013;Sobotta et al, 2013;Zitta et al, 2012). One drawback to any GOX system, however, is the production of hydrogen peroxide, a reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Fruehauf and Meyskens, 2007) whose accumulation would not only cause undesired cellular response but also inactivate both GOX and CAT (Hielscher and Gerecht, 2015;Pal et al, 2000;Trachootham et al, 2009;Tse and Gough, 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some recent work has started to explore the ability of GOX/CAT reactions to induce hypoxia for in vitro cell culture (Askoxylakis et al, 2011;Baumann et al, 2008;Huang et al, 2013;Li et al, 2016;Millonig et al, 2009;Mueller et al, 2009;Rajan et al, 2013;Sobotta et al, 2013). The GOX/CAT system has also been adapted to 3D printed inserts (Li et al, 2016) where GOX and CAT were coated on printed disks and the degrees of solution hypoxia were controlled by the distance between the enzyme-immobilized disks and the solution in the culture plate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%