2021
DOI: 10.1080/19320248.2021.1900974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring The Response Of The Victorian Emergency And Community Food Sector To The COVID-19 Pandemic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
67
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
5
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…40,41,43,45 Foodbank, 45 a major food relief organisation, reported a 61% increase in Australians accessing food relief since COVID-19 with 31% seeking food relief at least once a week in 2020 compared to 15% in 2019 with similar findings from two other studies. 40,41 Onethird of previous food relief recipients opted not to access food relief during the pandemic and food insecure people and families did not always access relief when needed. 40,41,48 COVID-19 also necessitated changes to operations by emergency providers that included closures during lockdowns, reducing operating hours, phone assessments and providing take-away to minimise social interaction while serving more people.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…40,41,43,45 Foodbank, 45 a major food relief organisation, reported a 61% increase in Australians accessing food relief since COVID-19 with 31% seeking food relief at least once a week in 2020 compared to 15% in 2019 with similar findings from two other studies. 40,41 Onethird of previous food relief recipients opted not to access food relief during the pandemic and food insecure people and families did not always access relief when needed. 40,41,48 COVID-19 also necessitated changes to operations by emergency providers that included closures during lockdowns, reducing operating hours, phone assessments and providing take-away to minimise social interaction while serving more people.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…41 Many food relief agencies reported difficulties in sourcing quality foods (55%), foods for special dietary requirements (29%) and cultural groups (23%). 40,41 Table 2 also shows the factors influencing the changes in food security status during the pandemic which included government restrictions, changes to food suppliers and supply logistics, fear of COVID-19 transmission, product limits, COVID-related job and income changes, cost of living, receiving government financial support, difficulties accessing welfare or food relief, and stigma associated with food banks. [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] Changes in employments such as becoming retrenched, unemployed or having reduced work hours, and income changes appeared to be major drivers of food insecurity during COVID-19.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-pharmaceutical interventions during the pandemic involving restrictions in mobility have increased the friction of travel, in particular by transit on which low income populations are more reliant (e.g., DeWeese et al, 2020 ). At the same time, the pandemic has created additional stress for the operators of food banks through disruptions in the supply chain (e.g., McKay et al, 2021 ) as well as concerns surrounding the delivery of service in safe conditions and possible cancellation of food service programs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unique context of COVID-19 amplified the risk of food insecurity for those already at risk and created new demographics of food stress [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ]. The economic impacts of COVID-19 and social isolation measures resulted in novel cohorts of people that suddenly found themselves at risk of food stress and food insecurity [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, food insecurity in these groups reduced as they were able to afford food and other basic living costs. However, some new cohorts emerged, including international students [ 19 , 20 ] temporary visa holders, as they were ineligible for government support [ 12 ] and people impacted by natural disasters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%