2010
DOI: 10.1080/0312407x.2010.508167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the Potential of Social Network Analysis in Asset-based Community Development Practice and Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
46
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the development of asset‐based interventions, the assets of potentially marginalised groups such as older people (particularly in areas of deprivation) can be overlooked (Benenson & Stagg, ; Ennis & West, ). A strength of the CET programme is in highlighting the visibility of older people – both as volunteers and service users – as a community asset and central to the programme's delivery and sustainability (e.g., as customers with spending power or as a source of human and social capital) rather than as passive recipients of help (or worse, as a burden).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the development of asset‐based interventions, the assets of potentially marginalised groups such as older people (particularly in areas of deprivation) can be overlooked (Benenson & Stagg, ; Ennis & West, ). A strength of the CET programme is in highlighting the visibility of older people – both as volunteers and service users – as a community asset and central to the programme's delivery and sustainability (e.g., as customers with spending power or as a source of human and social capital) rather than as passive recipients of help (or worse, as a burden).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overlapping and duplication of strategies should be avoided. Governmental departments, NGOs and businesses should be involved with the community members in the analysis of the livelihood and the development of strategies which are geared towards sustainable outcomes (Burkey, 1993;Kretzmann & McKnight, 1993;Emmett, 2000;Ashford & Patkar, 2001;Carney, 2002;Brocklesby & Fisher, 2003;Mathie & Cunningham, 2003, 2005, 2008Davids et al, 2005;Brueggemann, 2006;Swanepoel & De Beer, 2006;Morse et al, 2009;Scoones, 2009;Ennis & West, 2010;Schenck et al, 2010. ) …”
Section: Principles Underlying the Practice Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the ABCD approach positions outside institutions as facilitators to uncover internal strengths and assets that community members can use to address the problems they define as needing attention. Although ABCD has been criticized for not attending to the macro-level causes of disempowerment, the focus on relationship and community-building can mobilize groups for collective action to address root causes of concerns (Ennis & West, 2010).…”
Section: Parent Cafés: Asset-based Collective Family Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%