2011
DOI: 10.1177/1098214011411573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the Necessary Conditions for Evaluation Use in Program Change

Abstract: Research has identified a wide range of factors that affect evaluation use but continues to be inconclusive as to their relative importance. This article addresses the complex phenomenon of evaluation use in three ways: first, it draws on recent conceptual developments to delimitate the examined form of use; second, it aims at identifying conditions that are necessary but not necessarily sufficient for evaluation use; third, it combines mechanisms of evaluation use, context conditions, and actor perceptions. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
56
0
14

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(42 reference statements)
2
56
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…An attempt to trace its roots as a profession brings about the 'chicken-egg dilemma' because there is hardly any science of what comes first (Basheka & Byamugisha 2015). Ledermann (2012) equally reminds his audience that the questions of whether or not evaluations are used are as old as the evaluation business itself, and this serves to confirm that it is indeed an old practice but a new discipline as more scholarship on the same is relatively new. Patton (2002) suggests that the history of evaluations and their utilisation were holy processes in the management cycle of organisations, arguing that from the bible, the first evaluation of the 10 days dietary project that got Daniel, Hannaniah, Mishael and Azariah fed on vegetables and water healthier and better fed saw its findings put to practical use (Dan 1:1-20).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An attempt to trace its roots as a profession brings about the 'chicken-egg dilemma' because there is hardly any science of what comes first (Basheka & Byamugisha 2015). Ledermann (2012) equally reminds his audience that the questions of whether or not evaluations are used are as old as the evaluation business itself, and this serves to confirm that it is indeed an old practice but a new discipline as more scholarship on the same is relatively new. Patton (2002) suggests that the history of evaluations and their utilisation were holy processes in the management cycle of organisations, arguing that from the bible, the first evaluation of the 10 days dietary project that got Daniel, Hannaniah, Mishael and Azariah fed on vegetables and water healthier and better fed saw its findings put to practical use (Dan 1:1-20).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The extent to which these evaluations are utilised has been associated with the design of the institutions for which and in which evaluations are carried out. On this subject, Balthasar (2006, 2007in Ledermann 2012, 2009), has systematically presented the effect of the institutional design on the utilisation of evaluations. In addition, for the case of Kyambogo University (KYU), notwithstanding the numerous evaluations that have been carried out, available evidence indicates that the utilisation level for the evaluation results is still weak.…”
Section: Problem Statement and Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Para fortalecer una adecuada utilización de las evaluaciones, es importante analizar bien los contextos de decisión de los usuarios potenciales y centrar el estudio en aspectos relevantes para dicha tarea (Ledermann, 2012;Leviton, 2003;Neuman et al, 2013). El desarrollo de la cultura evaluativa en las organizaciones es otro elemento facilitador de la utilización adecuada de los procesos evaluativos (Cousins et al 2014).…”
Section: │9unclassified
“…In light of the myriad of factors known to impact on evaluation use, including stakeholders’ receptiveness to findings and perceived need for action [17,18], political contexts [3,17], perceived quality of evaluations [17,18], methods used to communicate findings [17], and timeliness of findings [17], this 'translational gap’ is perhaps unsurprising.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%