2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.lmot.2016.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the effects of seductive details with the 4-phase model of interest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
1
7

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
2
27
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Durik and Harackiewicz (2007) found that decorative details added to visual representations were beneficial for students who were not interested in learning mathematics but detrimental for those who were already interested in learning. Conversely, Wang and Adesope (2016) found that decorative details had negative effects among students with lower interest in the learning topic but positive effects among students with higher interest.…”
Section: Individual Differencesmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Durik and Harackiewicz (2007) found that decorative details added to visual representations were beneficial for students who were not interested in learning mathematics but detrimental for those who were already interested in learning. Conversely, Wang and Adesope (2016) found that decorative details had negative effects among students with lower interest in the learning topic but positive effects among students with higher interest.…”
Section: Individual Differencesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Although dimensions of students' attitudes are often correlated (e.g., Chouinard, Karsenti, & Roy, 2007;Eccles & Wigfield, 1995), it seems possible that students' interest in mathematics and their attitudes about its value may have differential effects on their processing of diagrams and illustrations. For example, both Durik and Harackiewicz (2007) and Wang and Adesope (2016) found that students' interest moderated the effect of decorative details-a feature of illustrations rather than sparse diagrams.…”
Section: Individual Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Defenisi minat adalah suatu rasa lebih suka, rasa ketertarikan (Slameto, 2010), perhatian (Lin & Huang, 2016), fokus, ketekunan, usaha, pengetahuan, keterampilan (Ainley, Hillman, & Hidi, 2002), motivasi (Krapp, Hidi, & Renninger, 1992), pengatur perilaku (Wang & Adesope, 2016), dan hasil interaksi seseorang atau individu dengan konten atau kegiatan tertentu (Schiefele, 2001). Minat memberikan pengaruh positif terhadap pembelajaran akademik, domain pengetahuan dan bidang studi tertentu bagi individu (Hidi, Berndoff, dan Ainley, 2002).…”
Section: Minat Belajarunclassified
“…Seperti pada permainan Chem Man yang mendorong peserta didik belajar dengan cara yang menyenangkan, dilihat dari aktivitas peserta didik saat menggunakan permainan Chem Man. Hidi dan Renninger yakin bahwa minat mempengaruhi tiga aspek penting dalam pengetahuan seseorang yaitu perhatian, tujuan dan tingkat pembelajaran (Wang & Adesope, 2016). Secara tidak langsung peserta didik berusaha memahami materi pembelajaran yakni materi partikel penyusun atom saat permainan Chem Man berlangsung untuk dapat menyelesaikan permainan sampai akhir.…”
Section: Hasil Angket Minat Belajar Peserta Didikunclassified