2013 4th International Conference on Intelligent Systems, Modelling and Simulation 2013
DOI: 10.1109/isms.2013.48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the Effect of Circulation on the Power of Implantable Glucose Bio Fuel Cell

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, such polymer‐electrolyte glucose fuel cells exhibit low steady‐state power densities below 10 µW cm −2 . [ 24,78–82 ] In contrast, the ceramic glucose fuel cells reported here achieve competitive power densities, with that of the top‐performing device reaching 43 µW cm −2 , and the average power density across 12 glucose fuel cells reaching 11.4 µW cm −2 . In addition, the thickness of the ceramic glucose fuel cell is three times thinner than the next‐thinnest device, and ≈1000 times thinner than other abiotic glucose fuel cells reported to date.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, such polymer‐electrolyte glucose fuel cells exhibit low steady‐state power densities below 10 µW cm −2 . [ 24,78–82 ] In contrast, the ceramic glucose fuel cells reported here achieve competitive power densities, with that of the top‐performing device reaching 43 µW cm −2 , and the average power density across 12 glucose fuel cells reaching 11.4 µW cm −2 . In addition, the thickness of the ceramic glucose fuel cell is three times thinner than the next‐thinnest device, and ≈1000 times thinner than other abiotic glucose fuel cells reported to date.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…d) Polarization curve of a ceramic glucose fuel cell, exhibiting a peak power density of 43 µW cm −2 . e) Comparison of previously reported polymer‐electrolyte‐based glucose fuel cells [ 24,78–82 ] with those in this work, i.e., ceramic‐electrolyte glucose fuel cells: power density as a function of fuel‐cell thickness. The ceramic glucose fuel cells show three times higher miniaturization and higher power densities than existing abiotic glucose fuel cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%