2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-99951-7_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the Determinants of IoT Adoption: Findings from a Systematic Literature Review

Abstract: The Internet of Things (IoT) heralds a new era of disruptive technologies that provide organizations with both benefits and challenges. However, organizational adoption of IoT is not yet widespread and greater understanding of the phenomenon is required. This study examines the existing literature on the key determinants (drivers, benefits, barriers, and challenges) that influence the adoption of IoT by organizations. Therefore, this paper presents findings from a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) and concept… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
36
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…(Carcary et al, 2018) Literature Review (Atzori, Iera and Morabito, 2010;Miorandi et al, 2012;Singh, Tripathi and Jara, 2014;Li, Xu, and Zhao, 2015;Gil et al, 2016;Burhanuddin et al, 2017;Sethi and Sarangi, 2017;Ray, 2018) Literature Survey (Gubbi et al 2013;Borgia 2014) Despite being a current trend, our initial research did not return secondary studies conducted systematically, nor did they present the methodology followed, nor the research questions that the papers intended to answer. The papersexcept in (Whitmore, Agarwal and Da Xu, 2015;Carcary et al, 2018) -do not present the research protocol or make explicit the study properties (research questions, search strings, databases, selection criteria, selected articles, among others). For this reason, we have not performed a Quality Assessment since there is no methodology related information to be evaluated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…(Carcary et al, 2018) Literature Review (Atzori, Iera and Morabito, 2010;Miorandi et al, 2012;Singh, Tripathi and Jara, 2014;Li, Xu, and Zhao, 2015;Gil et al, 2016;Burhanuddin et al, 2017;Sethi and Sarangi, 2017;Ray, 2018) Literature Survey (Gubbi et al 2013;Borgia 2014) Despite being a current trend, our initial research did not return secondary studies conducted systematically, nor did they present the methodology followed, nor the research questions that the papers intended to answer. The papersexcept in (Whitmore, Agarwal and Da Xu, 2015;Carcary et al, 2018) -do not present the research protocol or make explicit the study properties (research questions, search strings, databases, selection criteria, selected articles, among others). For this reason, we have not performed a Quality Assessment since there is no methodology related information to be evaluated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the selected papers, seven essential topics were addressed ( Figure 1):  Concepts -Presenting discussions regarding the fundamentals, definitions, and visions behind the IoT paradigm; Articles (Atzori, Iera and Morabito, 2010;Bandyopadhyay and Sen, 2011;Miorandi et al, 2012;Gubbi et al, 2013;Borgia, 2014;Singh, Tripathi and Jara, 2014;Li, Xu and Zhao, 2015;Madakam, Ramaswamy and Tripathi, 2015;Gil et al, 2016;Trappey et al, 2017;Carcary et al, 2018).  Technology -Introducing enabling technologies and solutions to develop and deploy IoT applications.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations