2021
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202101338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the Charge Dynamics and Energy Loss in Ternary Organic Solar Cells with a Fill Factor Exceeding 80%

Abstract: Ternary architecture is a promising strategy to enhance power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) of organic solar cells (OSCs). However, among all the photovoltaic parameters that govern the final PCEs, the fill factor (FF) for ternary OSCs is generally below 78%, limiting solar cells’ performance. Here, charge dynamics in the ternary cells PM6:DRTB‐T‐C4:Y6 with a FF of 80.88% and a PCE of 17.05% are thoroughly investigated by a series of transient characterization technologies, including transient absorption spec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
70
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimal ternary OSC has the smallest k nge of 1.04 × 10 −17 m 3 s −1 and has two orders of magnitude difference between k nge and k L (Figure 4d), which indicate the suppressed charge recombination and thus the improved charge transport in the ternary device. [32] We quantitatively calculate the energy loss of the ternary device as per the framework of Marcus theory (Table S7, Supporting Information). [50,51] The total energy loss (E loss ) is described as: E g − eV OC = (E g − E CT ) + ΔE rad + ΔE non − rad , [52] where E g represents the bandgap determined by the intersection of absorption and emission spectra of the films (Figure S21, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The optimal ternary OSC has the smallest k nge of 1.04 × 10 −17 m 3 s −1 and has two orders of magnitude difference between k nge and k L (Figure 4d), which indicate the suppressed charge recombination and thus the improved charge transport in the ternary device. [32] We quantitatively calculate the energy loss of the ternary device as per the framework of Marcus theory (Table S7, Supporting Information). [50,51] The total energy loss (E loss ) is described as: E g − eV OC = (E g − E CT ) + ΔE rad + ΔE non − rad , [52] where E g represents the bandgap determined by the intersection of absorption and emission spectra of the films (Figure S21, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the smaller dark leakage current in region I originates from the reduced shut resistance (Figure S16, Supporting Information), also contributing to the high FF in the ternary device. [ 32 ] We further study the plots of V oc versus light intensity ( P ) to elucidate the charge recombination kinetics. The dependence of V oc on P is described as VocnKnormalBTqIn(P) ( K B is the Boltzmann constant, T is the absolute temperature, and q is the elemental charge).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Different from binary OSCs, ternary OSCs appear to be a viable tool to extend light absorption, facilitate exciton dissociation and optimize the morphology, leading to an improvement of photovoltaic performances. 19–27 Cascade energy alignment could be achieved by introducing a third component with suitable energy levels, which is beneficial to suppress charge recombination. 28,29 Another significant function of the third component is to improve the compatibility and miscibility with the binary blend films.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%