2018
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring sequence-based features for the improved prediction of DNA N4-methylcytosine sites in multiple species

Abstract: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
113
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
113
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the above context, computational tools were developed for detecting different modification sites, including protein methylation (Wei et al 2018d), protein phosphorylation ) and dephosphorylation (Jia et al 2017), protein O-GlcNAcylation , histone crotonylation (Qiu et al 2017), DNA N 4 -methylcytosine (Chen et al 2017c;Wei et al 2018b), RNA pseudouridine (Chen et al 2016b), and various RNA adenosine modifications (Chen et al 2018). However, it has been proven that sequence alignment (e.g., PSI-BLAST) cannot accurately identify the modification sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the above context, computational tools were developed for detecting different modification sites, including protein methylation (Wei et al 2018d), protein phosphorylation ) and dephosphorylation (Jia et al 2017), protein O-GlcNAcylation , histone crotonylation (Qiu et al 2017), DNA N 4 -methylcytosine (Chen et al 2017c;Wei et al 2018b), RNA pseudouridine (Chen et al 2016b), and various RNA adenosine modifications (Chen et al 2018). However, it has been proven that sequence alignment (e.g., PSI-BLAST) cannot accurately identify the modification sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While 6mA and 4mC are very small, they can only be detected in eukaryotes by high sensitivity techniques. In prokaryotes, 6mA and 4mC are the majority, mainly used to distinguish host DNA from exogenous pathogenic DNA (Heyn and Esteller, 2015), and 4mc controls DNA replication and corrects DNA replication errors (Cheng et al, 1995;Wei et al, 2018). Moreover, 4mC as part of a restriction-modification (R-M) system prevents restriction enzymes from degrading host DNA (Schweizer et al, 2008;Wei et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second 4mC site predictor, called 4mCPred (He et al, 2018), proposes a new feature coding algorithm by combining positionspecific trinucleotide propensity and electron-ion interaction pseudopotentials, which improves the accuracy of prediction. The third 4mC site predictor, called 4mcPred-SVM (Wei et al, 2018), proposes more useful sequence features in the predictor and improves the feature representation capability through a two-step feature selection method. However, the performance of the experiment did not improve much.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the prediction of 4mC sites by this sequencing technique has been improved to some extent, recent studies focus more on the recognition of 4mC sites using machine learning, which is capable of predicting 4mC sites based on genome sequences, without any prior experimental knowledge. There are currently four methods available in literature to identify 4mC sites, including iDNA4mC (Chen et al, 2017), 4mCPred (Su et al, 2018), 4mcPred-SVM (Wei et al, 2018a), and 4mcPred-IFL (Wei et al, 2019a). iDNA4mC, as the first machine learning predictor, encodes sequences by nucleotide chemical properties and nucleotide frequency to features and trains support vector machine (SVM) models for prediction (Liang et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%