2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring patterns of substance use among highly vulnerable Black women at-risk for HIV through a syndemics framework: A qualitative study

Abstract: Black women who use alcohol, marijuana, and other drugs are disproportionately affected by health disparities. Black women's HIV diagnosis rates are 15 times higher than White women, and is among the leading causes of death among Black women in the US. Previous studies support the association between substance use and HIV risk, yet it is essential to better understand the specific factors experienced within the context of substance misuse and recovery among vulnerable Black women at-risk for substance misuse, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Female sex workers may be less likely to receive and access STI prevention services 77 than other at-risk populations, and drug use among FSWs may be associated with an even higher risk of STIs compared with FSW who do not use drugs 78 . Epidemics of substance use and syphilis among US heterosexual men and women can be considered syndemics, which are overlapping epidemics that share common root causes, including poverty, unemployment, intimate partner violence, and homelessness 79–83 …”
Section: Epidemiology Of Stis Linked To Substance Usementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Female sex workers may be less likely to receive and access STI prevention services 77 than other at-risk populations, and drug use among FSWs may be associated with an even higher risk of STIs compared with FSW who do not use drugs 78 . Epidemics of substance use and syphilis among US heterosexual men and women can be considered syndemics, which are overlapping epidemics that share common root causes, including poverty, unemployment, intimate partner violence, and homelessness 79–83 …”
Section: Epidemiology Of Stis Linked To Substance Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…78 Epidemics of substance use and syphilis among US heterosexual men and women can be considered syndemics, which are overlapping epidemics that share common root causes, including poverty, unemployment, intimate partner violence, and homelessness. [79][80][81][82][83] Persons seeking treatment of STIs often have SUD. In a study of Baltimore sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics, 57% of clients had SUD (35% alcohol, 31% cannabis, 11% opioids, and 8% stimulants), 84 which is higher than expected for the general US population.…”
Section: Epidemiology Of Stis Linked To Substance Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk factors for HIV transmission also remain stable, and include sharing of needles and syringes, having condomless intercourse, exchanging of sex for drugs, money, or other goods, and having other sexually transmitted infections [ 3 , 4 , 5 ]. These behavioral risk factors are additionally associated with a range of psychosocial sequelae, such as depression and suicidal ideation [ 6 , 7 , 8 ], psychological distress [ 9 , 10 ], alcohol and substance use and abuse disorders [ 11 , 12 , 13 ], disrupted social support [ 14 , 15 , 16 ], and experiences with violence [ 17 ]. Despite the extensive literature, which details HIV related risk behaviors and their synergistic impact on health outcomes, new perspectives that include a life-course perspective, are critical to ending the HIV epidemic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All interviews were conducted in English ( n = 17) or Spanish ( n = 1) by female interviewers. LAN who was trained in qualitative methods and conducted previous studies using these methods (McDaniel et al, 2023 ; Nydegger & Claborn, 2020 ; Nydegger et al, 2021a , 2021b ) conducted a majority of interviews; the remaining interviews were conducted by research assistants trained by LAN. Interviews were between 30 min and 3.3 h (M = 1.4 h), with interview 1 averaging 1.88 h (range 1.1–3.3 h), interview 2 averaging 0.97 h (range 0.53–1.47 h), and interview 3 averaging 1.35 h (range 0.5–2.45 h) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%