Exploring Co-Construction of Learning Environments at the Boundary of School and Work Through the Lens of Vocational Practice

Abstract

Educational institutions and vocational practices need to collaborate to design learning environments that meet current-day societal demands and support the development of learners’ vocational competence. Integration of learning experiences across contexts can be facilitated by intentionally structured learning environments at the boundary of school and work. Such learning environments are co-constructed by educational institutions and vocational practices. However, co-construction is challenged by differences between the practices of school and work, which can lead to discontinuities across the school–work boundary. More understanding is needed about the nature of these discontinuities and about design considerations to counterbalance these discontinuities. Studies on the co-construction of learning environments are scarce, especially studies from the perspective of representatives of work practice. Therefore, the present study explores design considerations for co-construction through the lens of vocational practice. The study reveals a variety of discontinuities related to the designable elements of learning environments (i.e. epistemic, spatial, instrumental, temporal, and social elements). The findings help to improve understanding of design strategies for counterbalancing discontinuities at the interpersonal and institutional levels of the learning environment. The findings confirm that work practice has a different orientation than school practice since there is a stronger focus on productivity and on the quality of the services provided. However, various strategies for co-construction also seem to take into account the mutually beneficial learning potential of the school–work boundary.

Cognitive and play space of educational institutions of the future: trends, models, cases

“…According to Sun & Peng (2020), Niemi, Minkkinen, & Poikkeus (2022), Bouw, Zitter, & de Bruijn (2021), cognitive and play space at the educational institution must be organized in several stages. The first stage (preliminary) concerns specification of objectives and analysis of psychological, pedagogical, methodical, organizational, material and mechanical maintenance of the educational process.…”

How to Support Co-creation in Higher Education: The Validation of a Questionnaire

“…Co-creation can positively affect student engagement (Bovill & Felten, 2016), it supports the development of positive relationships and community, it stimulates student engagement and enjoyment, it promotes students taking risks and overcoming challenges, and it leads to academic achievement and student retention (Lubicz-Nawrocka & Bovill, 2021). It is also a useful pedagogical method to bridge the gap between studying at a university and working as a professional (Bakker & Akkerman, 2014;Bouw et al, 2021a). Further, it contributes to a continuous professionalization of teachers and working field professionals and to innovations in both practice and educational programs, by addressing wicked problems in both contexts (Dollinger et al, 2018).…”