2015 Joint Rail Conference 2015
DOI: 10.1115/jrc2015-5683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploration of Alternatives for Prestressed Concrete Monoblock Crosstie Design Based on Flexural Capacity

Abstract: Recent North American railway trends signify a transition to increased axle loads and higher train speeds. The use of concrete crossties is common practice in these applications for a variety of reasons, including higher load-carrying capacity and improved ability to maintain proper track geometry. Currently, prestressed concrete monoblock crossties share many geometric and structural properties regardless of manufacturer. For multiple reasons, some manufacturers are investigating the potential benefits of new… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there has been a recent push to apply the principals of mechanistic-empirical (M-E) analysis design, currently used in pavement design, 13 to rail infrastructure component design. Initial suggestions for the application of a M-E analysis and design approach in the rail domain were documented by Van Dyk et al., 14 Csenge et al., 15 and Edwards et al. 16 These were further advanced by Quirós-Orozco 17 and Edwards, 18 leading to the development of a proposed framework for mechanistic-empirical analysis and design of railway track and its components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there has been a recent push to apply the principals of mechanistic-empirical (M-E) analysis design, currently used in pavement design, 13 to rail infrastructure component design. Initial suggestions for the application of a M-E analysis and design approach in the rail domain were documented by Van Dyk et al., 14 Csenge et al., 15 and Edwards et al. 16 These were further advanced by Quirós-Orozco 17 and Edwards, 18 leading to the development of a proposed framework for mechanistic-empirical analysis and design of railway track and its components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%