2015 International Symposium on Network Coding (NetCod) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/netcod.2015.7176793
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploiting symmetry in computing polyhedral bounds on network coding rate regions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where (b) is by the sub-modularity of the entropy function, and (c) is because of (3). Now substituting (63) into (61) gives (28), which completes the proof.…”
Section: M + 2rmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…where (b) is by the sub-modularity of the entropy function, and (c) is because of (3). Now substituting (63) into (61) gives (28), which completes the proof.…”
Section: M + 2rmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…It should be noted that in [2], the region of interest was obtained by first finding a set of fine-spaced points on the boundary of the outer bound using the reduced LP, and then manually identifying the effective bounding segments using these boundary points. This task can however be accomplished more efficiently using an approach proposed by Lassez and Lassez [27], as pointed out in [28]. This prompted the author to implement this part of the computer program using this more efficient approach.…”
Section: A Computed-aided Approach To Find Outer Boundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that, because it leaves the sets of edges, decoder demands, and topology constraints set-wise invariant, the elements of the stabilizer subgroup G (Q,W) also leave the set of rate region constraints L A invariant. Such a group of permutations on sources and edges is called the network symmetry group [32], [33], which is further exploited in [18] and [23] to substantially reduce the complexity of computing the network's rate regions. This network symmetry group plays a role in the present study because, as depicted in Figures 3a and 3b, by the orbit stabilizer theorem mentioned above, it determines the number of networks equivalent to a given canonical network (the representative we will select from the orbit).…”
Section: B Expressing Network Equivalence With a Group Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al used a similar computational approach to tackle the multilevel diversity coding problem [17] and multi-source network coding problems with simple network topology [21] (also see Reference [22]); however, the main focus was to provide an efficient enumeration and classification of the large number of specific small instances (all instances considered require 7 or fewer random variables), where each instance itself poses little computation issue. Beyond computing outer bounds, the problem of computationally generating inner bounds was also explored [23,24].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%