Explaining individual student success using continuous assessment types and student characteristics

Abstract

Individual student success is influenced by the educational environment and student characteristics. One adaptation of the educational environment to improve student success is the introduction of continuous, or in-course, assessment. Previous research already identified several student characteristics that are related to student success as measured by student achievement, like previous achievements, motivation, self-efficacy and gender. The two facets are investigated in a group of first-year undergraduate Law students in the Netherlands, by examining the relationship of different types of continuous assessment and student characteristics with academic achievement. A questionnaire, measuring demographic information, selfregulation and motivational constructs, was completed by 94 students and their grades were requested from the student administration. Repeated measures ANCOVAs with assessment type as the within-subject factor identified that student achievement is not dependent on the type of continuous assessment. Students with higher high-school GPAs got higher scores across assessment types. Male students performed worse than their female peers in courses without continuous assessment, but in courses using any type of continuous assessment, this gender difference disappeared. Intrinsic motivation was a negative predictor of achievement in courses using writing assignments and mandatory homework assignments. Results from the current study indicate that continuous assessment may be a potent measure to improve male students' success by closing the gender achievement gap, and that students with high levels of intrinsic motivation do not benefit from continuous assessment.

The Key Success Criteria for University Students Who Are Studying While Working

“…A new literacy that includes digital and media technologies have evolved, especially the literacy instruction in the library, which shown to be linked positively with the success and retention of students [10]. This is possible with technology-enabled tools that also can support the strategies learnings [11] and continuous assessments [12]. [5] stated that psychosocial factors significantly to the prediction of student success, referring to students who are capable to make a good coordination of attitudes and behaviors.…”

Frontier perspectives and insights into higher education student success

“…Other scholars approached student success in terms of outcomes, for instance learning or employability outcomes. In these papers, important questions emerge about the relationship between learning outcomes (Day, van Blankenstein, Westenberg, & Admiraal, 2018) and employability (Gu, Zhao, & Wu, 2018) with varying factors that recognise the complexity of trying to predict or formulate associations for student success. Scholars grapple with the role of collecting data on outcomes (Liu et al, 2018) and the use of metrics by policymakers (Jackson & Bridgstock, 2018).…”

Stimulating higher education students to use online formative assessments: the case of two mid-term take-home tests

“…This study contributes to the higher education literature in several ways. First, most other studies examine the effect of a single assessment type (Day et al 2018a). This study combines voluntary online exercises with the intervention of intermediate tests.…”