2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11881-018-00175-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expert reading coaching via technology: Investigating the reading, writing, and spelling outcomes of students in grades K–8 experiencing significant reading learning disabilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, in relation to the main research lines within the ICT field and literacy learning (Q3) through the visualization of bibliometric map, it should be said that, during the period analysed, studies on ICT and reading and writing are being linked thematically to students with learning difficulties, Down Syndrome or autism (BAILEY;ARCIULI;STANCLIFFE, 2016;FELIX et al, 2017;WEISER et al, 2019). Likewise, there is an emerging issue group related to teacher training in ICT as a tool for learning to read and write.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, in relation to the main research lines within the ICT field and literacy learning (Q3) through the visualization of bibliometric map, it should be said that, during the period analysed, studies on ICT and reading and writing are being linked thematically to students with learning difficulties, Down Syndrome or autism (BAILEY;ARCIULI;STANCLIFFE, 2016;FELIX et al, 2017;WEISER et al, 2019). Likewise, there is an emerging issue group related to teacher training in ICT as a tool for learning to read and write.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All studies are summarized in Table 1. Four of the 16 studies analyzed recommended the use of ICT for students with autism and other intellectual disabilities (BAILEY; ARCIULI; STANCLIFFE, 2016;FELIX et al, 2017;WEISER et al, 2019;BADILLO-JIMÉNEZ;IGUARÁN-JIMÉNEZ, 2020). All the studies have been developed within the educational field and in any educational stage.…”
Section: Phase 1 Main Characteristics and Findings Of Selected Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have also investigated the role of coaching in improving teachers’ literacy instruction for secondary SWDs, in particular. For example, PD and expert coaching targeting elementary and middle school special education and resource room teachers’ multicomponent literacy instruction resulted in improved reading, writing, and spelling outcomes for students with learning disabilities (Weiser et al, 2019). In addition, Wexler et al (2022) reported that middle school general and special education co-teachers who received PD with coaching implemented a literacy instructional framework with fidelity, which led to statistically significant gains in reading comprehension for both students with and without disabilities.…”
Section: What Do We Know About Secondary Literacy Coaching Today?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Virtual coaching is a promising practice and supported by multiple studies (Allen et al, 2011; Vernon-Feagans et al, 2013, 2015; Weiser et al, 2019). Weiser and colleagues (2019), which is a study included in the What Works Clearinghouse, found that technology-based coaching was as effective as in-classroom support for increasing teachers’ knowledge and implementation of literacy practices.…”
Section: Current Research In Virtual Coachingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Virtual coaching is a promising practice and supported by multiple studies (Allen et al, 2011; Vernon-Feagans et al, 2013, 2015; Weiser et al, 2019). Weiser and colleagues (2019), which is a study included in the What Works Clearinghouse, found that technology-based coaching was as effective as in-classroom support for increasing teachers’ knowledge and implementation of literacy practices. They also found that virtual coaching supported the improvement of literacy outcomes for students with reading learning disabilities and that coaching via technology was a more efficient, less time-consuming method for providing ongoing PD.…”
Section: Current Research In Virtual Coachingmentioning
confidence: 99%