2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.02.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental validation of a EnergyPlus model: Application of a multi-storey naturally ventilated double skin façade

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Model validation is a phase that supersedes model fine-tuning. The validation process quantified the accuracy of results obtained by simulation, in comparison with the results obtained through measurements [23,24]. The criteria of eligibility, when the model is verified, are defined with the recommended statistical indicators.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Model validation is a phase that supersedes model fine-tuning. The validation process quantified the accuracy of results obtained by simulation, in comparison with the results obtained through measurements [23,24]. The criteria of eligibility, when the model is verified, are defined with the recommended statistical indicators.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper presents the energy assessment of the validated DSF model [24] through comparative analysis with models with traditional façades. S1504 THERMAL SCIENCE, Year 2016, Vol.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although empirical validation procedures, based on real metering and auditing data, are considered as very reliable procedures [47], they are often used for the validation of tools and mathematical models developed for simulating specific phenomena. In this regard, the literature shows several examples of such a procedure applied to the validation of models relative to thermally activated building systems [48][49][50], daylighting or HVAC interactions with respect to window or solar gain [51,52], double skin facades or ventilated cavity [53][54][55][56], activities of occupants and their interaction with the building loads [57], etc. It is worth noting that though experimental validations of single mathematical models for the simulation of the energy performance of a specific new building's technology, component or material, can be often easily carried out, the experimental validation of whole BEPS tools is mostly unfeasible.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to assess the effects of DSF on the building energy consumptions and comfort, different mathematical models are coupled to building energy and airflow models or specific simulation software [16], [40], [41]. Although such software are often proved to be a good choice between simulation accuracy and simulation time [42], a lack of whole building simulation tools including advanced DSF is highlighted. It is also noted the need of models which are flexible with respect to the development of suitable operation strategies and the implementation of specific mathematical models [43], [44].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%