2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2008.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study on the thermal performance of a mechanical cooling tower with different drift eliminators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although pressure drop is a primary variable, to evaluate a drift eliminator it will be necessary to assess its influence on the cooling tower's thermal performance. Lucas et al (2009) have 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 demonstrated, by the experimental calculation of the tower characteristic, that the physical configuration of the drift eliminator influences the thermal performance of the cooling tower for the same water to air mass flow ratio. This result was explained in terms of the drift eliminator getting wet and therefore becoming an additional packing volume and contributes to the heat and mass transfer exchange.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although pressure drop is a primary variable, to evaluate a drift eliminator it will be necessary to assess its influence on the cooling tower's thermal performance. Lucas et al (2009) have 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 demonstrated, by the experimental calculation of the tower characteristic, that the physical configuration of the drift eliminator influences the thermal performance of the cooling tower for the same water to air mass flow ratio. This result was explained in terms of the drift eliminator getting wet and therefore becoming an additional packing volume and contributes to the heat and mass transfer exchange.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, no important effect on increasing the outlet water temperature was found, and this may be used easily in front of the towers to filter dusty air. Lucas et al [12] developed a study to analyze the influence of the drift eliminator on the thermal performance of a draft counter-flow wet cooling tower. The tower characteristic was also correlated with water-to-air mass flow ratios for six different drift eliminators, obtaining an average difference between them of 46.54%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Walker et al (1923) proposed a basic theory of cooling tower operation. Merkel (1925) developed the first practical theory including the differential equations of heat and mass transfer, which has been well received as the basis for most work on cooling tower modeling and analysis (Khan et al, 2003;Elsarrag, 2006;Qureshi and Zubair, 2006;ASHRAE, 2008;Lucas et al, 2009). In Merkel's model, in order to simplify the analysis, the water loss of evaporation is neglected, and the Lewis relation is assumed as unity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%