This experimental study focusses on the viability of three low-grade biofuels in small-scale biomass units of 7-12 kW The tested materials were homemade grass pellets (gp1 and gp2) and a mixture of leaves and woody pellets (lp50) that were made without binders and completely characterized in terms of their chemical and physical properties (proximate analysis, elementary composition, ash content, flowability, etc.). The results obtained with the non-commercial fuels were compared with commercial wood pellets (wp). The viability study comprised the operational parameter influences, such as primary and secondary airflow, fuel consumption, etc., together with the impact of those parameters on the main problems in combustion (concentration and particle distribution, fouling and slagging). The results revealed that the biomass whose behavior during combustion induced fewer particulate emissions and deposits was the mixed fuel, made of 50% leaf + 50% wood pellet (lp50). Contrary to the grass-based pellets, lp50 has the possibility of being used in commercial devices with the incorporation of processes during the manufacturing that improve their properties. work helps researchers make choices related to the design and operation of facilities for the utilization of agricultural residues biomass [8]. Verma et al., due to a growing market for sunflower husks in Belgium, Ukraine, and Poland, decided to compare them with other fuels (wood, apple pomace, peat . . . ) in a residential pellet boiler, reaching efficiency values of up to 92.4% in the best case scenario [5,9]. Sampson et al. used biomass from agriculture, such as switchgrass and energy crops, and they verify the viability of their production with low cost and reduction of greenhouse effect because they have an important potential to displace fossil fuels [10]. Gonzalez et al. investigated the combustion of pellets made with different agricultural residues (forest, tomato plant, cardoon, and olive bone) for domestic heat production. They also investigated the mixture of these fuels in different percentages. In this study some combustion parameters have been analyzed and it was determined that the behavior of the residues is similar to that of the forest pellet. Besides, they verified that the optimum residue mixture was forest (25%) and tomato (75%) [11]. Regueiro et al. analyzed the viability of three non-commercial fuels (barley pellet, leaf pellet (100%), and a mixture with leaf pellet (25%) and wood pellet (75%)) through the study of different combustion parameters. They concluded that the first two options were a bad alternative. Nevertheless, the last one could be a good an option, although its commercialization it needs the incorporation of additives to improve the fuel properties. The particulate matter (PM) emissions for the low-grade biofuels were between 257 mg/Nm 3 and 325 mg/Nm 3 , 17 mg/Nm 3 and 43 mg/Nm 3 , and 22 mg/Nm 3 and 53 mg/Nm 3 for pellet made of barley, leaf, and a mixture of 25% leaf/-75% wood, respectively [12]. Andreasen and Larsen studie...