2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2011.01.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental solidification of an andesitic melt by cooling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…6), and observed that the slope of the crystal size distributions (CSDs) decreased with quench temperature. Very similar behaviour was seen in andesitic melts by Iezzi et al (2011), except that the CSDs were more strongly curved. Such behaviour was also seen in the basaltic Makaopuhi lava lake and was interpreted as a result of kinetic growth (Cashman and Marsh 1988), but these textures could also be interpreted to reflect coarsening (Higgins 2006).…”
Section: Textural Measurements In Experimental Petrologysupporting
confidence: 50%
“…6), and observed that the slope of the crystal size distributions (CSDs) decreased with quench temperature. Very similar behaviour was seen in andesitic melts by Iezzi et al (2011), except that the CSDs were more strongly curved. Such behaviour was also seen in the basaltic Makaopuhi lava lake and was interpreted as a result of kinetic growth (Cashman and Marsh 1988), but these textures could also be interpreted to reflect coarsening (Higgins 2006).…”
Section: Textural Measurements In Experimental Petrologysupporting
confidence: 50%
“…affected by a weak heterogeneous nucleation on Pt at high fO 2 conditions (Iezzi et al, 2008 and2011;Mollo et al, 2012b).…”
Section: Effects Of Sample Containers and Micro-bubblesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…18 Our current understanding of the crystallisation behaviour of anhydrous natural silicate melts relies on previous cooling-induced dynamic crystallisation experiments either ex-situ (Gibb, 1974;Lofgren et al, 1974;1979;1986;Walker et al, 1976 and1978;Bianco and Taylor, 1977;Lofgren, 1977;Grove and Raudsepp, 1978;Donaldson, 1979;Uhlmann et al, 1979;1981;Corrigan, 1982;Fang et al, 1983;Kirkpatrick et al, 1981;1983Tsuchyama, 1983Baker and Grove, 1985;Lesher et al, 1999;Burkhard, 2005;Conte et al, 2006;Faure et al, 2003;Pupier et al, 2007;Walton and Herd, 2007;Orlando et al, 2008;Hammer, 2009;Del Gaudio et al, 2010;Iezzi et al, 2008;2011;Mollo et al, 2010;2011;Vona and Romano, 2013 and references therein) or in a few in-situ (Sunagawa, 1992;Schiavi et al, 2009;Ni et al, 2014). More comprehensive literature reviews can be found in (Lofgren, 1980;Kirkpatrick, 1981;Cashman, 1989;Lasaga, 1997;Hammer, 2008;Zhang, 2008).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The area% of each phase was quantified by translating differences in gray levels to the area% of glass, clinopyroxene (cpx), spinel (spl), plagioclase (plag), olivine (ol), biotite (bt), and bubbles. We did not apply a stereological correction, in order to avoid any mathematical manipulation of the data (Iezzi et al, 2011). This method has been used recently by, e.g., Vetere et al (2013a) to quantify the phase proportions in systems containing typically 4 phases (glass, pyroxenes, plagioclase, spinel).…”
Section: Image Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%