2012
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.109.177401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Realization of a Metamaterial Detector Focal Plane Array

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1(a).The element has been chosen as the face-to-face split ring resonator (SRR) pair that shares a same gap. 18,19 In our case, the element consists of a substrate layer backed by a metal ground, a combiner layer, a terminal that links to the RF combining network, and a current channel passing through the substrate and combiner layers and connecting between top metallic inclusions and the terminal in bottom surface of the combiner layer. The system is designed to operate at 2.45GHz and the dimensions of the element are: a=15.5mm, l=13.5mm, w1 =0.8mm, w2 =1.8mm, w3=2.0mm, g=3.0mm, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1(a).The element has been chosen as the face-to-face split ring resonator (SRR) pair that shares a same gap. 18,19 In our case, the element consists of a substrate layer backed by a metal ground, a combiner layer, a terminal that links to the RF combining network, and a current channel passing through the substrate and combiner layers and connecting between top metallic inclusions and the terminal in bottom surface of the combiner layer. The system is designed to operate at 2.45GHz and the dimensions of the element are: a=15.5mm, l=13.5mm, w1 =0.8mm, w2 =1.8mm, w3=2.0mm, g=3.0mm, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some new types of electrically small energy collectors have been introduced, such as the ground-backed complementary split ring resonators (G-SRRs), 15,16 the wideband G-SRRs based on bow-tie cavities, 17 and the face-to-face split ring resonators. 18,19 It has been shown that, in contrast with a single resonator, an array of resonators with close proximity of each other can enhance the power harvesting efficiency. 16 Furthermore, it has been shown that electrically small resonators in an array form provide wider frequency bandwidth in comparison with conventional antennas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Impedance matching only occurs for a narrow bandwidth, dependent on the MM configuration. By scaling the array period, ERR geometry and insulating layer thickness between the ERR and the ground plane MM absorbers can operate from the IR [26] to the microwave regimes [27]. MM based absorption is inherently narrowband however it is possible to produce a dual band response by adding a second ERR [28] or illicit a broadband response by stacking ERRs on top of one another [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The periodic nature of MM absorbers lends itself to coupling with micro-bolometer sensing elements to form a focal plane array (FPA). MM based FPAs have been developed in both the S band (2-4 GHz) [27] and at THz frequencies (2.5 THz) where the MM absorbers were monolithically integrated into a standard 0.35 μm CMOS process and the vanadium oxide microbolometer sensors deposited on top [30,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The periodic nature of MM absorbers lends itself to coupling with microbolometer sensing elements to form a focal plane array (FPA). Such an 11 × 11 MM-based FPA operating in the S band (2-4 GHz) has been presented [18] whereby the associated read-out electronics are discrete and implemented on a printed circuit board. At THz frequencies, where the MM array dimensions are smaller, the potential of MM absorbers for THz imaging applications has been demonstrated via the monolithic integration of MM absorbers into a standard foundry CMOS process and subsequent post deposition of vanadium oxide microbolometer sensor elements [19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%