2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2021.104075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental-numerical study on the structural failure of concrete sewer pipes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The breaking test of the egg-shaped concrete pipe, a type of the complex cross-section, can be compared. While cracks occurred in the 6 o'clock direction (invert) in the eggshaped concrete pipe [22,23], this was not the case for the complex cross-section reinforced concrete pipe. This appears to be because the bottom of the complex cross-section reinforced concrete pipe is thicker than that of the egg-shaped concrete pipe and it is reinforced in a rectangular shape.…”
Section: Test Contentmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The breaking test of the egg-shaped concrete pipe, a type of the complex cross-section, can be compared. While cracks occurred in the 6 o'clock direction (invert) in the eggshaped concrete pipe [22,23], this was not the case for the complex cross-section reinforced concrete pipe. This appears to be because the bottom of the complex cross-section reinforced concrete pipe is thicker than that of the egg-shaped concrete pipe and it is reinforced in a rectangular shape.…”
Section: Test Contentmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…A similar pattern, however, was observed. In a study by Scheperboer et al [22], when a circular pipe failed, symmetrical cracks occurred in four directions. For an egg-shaped concrete pipe, which has a similar function to the pipe proposed in this study, symmetrical cracks also occurred in four directions.…”
Section: Structural Strength Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This modelling strategy was originally proposed in Xu and Needleman (1994), and allows for the robust simulation of crack patterns at arbitrary locations and in arbitrary directions. It naturally includes the effects of crack bifurcation, crack branching and crack coalescence, as previously demonstrated for applications related to historical paints (Eumelen et al, 2019(Eumelen et al, , 2020(Eumelen et al, , 2021, wood (Luimes et al, 2018;Scheperboer et al, 2019;Luimes and Suiker, 2021), polymers (Tijssens et al, 2000), fibrous composites (Cid Alfaro et al, 2010a,b;Geng and Suiker, 2019) and cementitious materials (Scheperboer et al, 2021). The interface elements are characterised by the interface damage model proposed in Cid Alfaro et al (2009).…”
Section: Interface Damage Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various experimental and numerical studies have addressed the effect of erosion voids on the stresses generated in pipe systems and in the surrounding soil, whereby the stress redistribution caused by the appearance of an erosion void is found to be characterized by its location, size and contact angle [41,47,61,68,71]. Since under void erosion the load transfer from the surrounding soil to the pipe generally takes place more localized, whereby the load magnitude increases, the susceptibility of the pipe system to cracking and damage, and thus to catastrophic failure, also increases [42,51,60,68].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%