Experimental Mandibular Regrowth by Distraction Osteogenesis: Long-term Results

Study of Distracted Bone in Maxilla: A Comparative Analysis

“…The rapid orthodontic movement of teeth without any complications proves this point [15]. In a study which analyzed the long term follow up of distracted mandible in canine model, it was found that the distracted mandible attains only 77% of the strength of the corresponding normal bone after a period of 12 months [25]. The reason for this may be attributed to low mineralization found in our study.…”

Study of Distracted Bone in Maxilla: A Comparative Analysis

“…The rapid orthodontic movement of teeth without any complications proves this point [15]. In a study which analyzed the long term follow up of distracted mandible in canine model, it was found that the distracted mandible attains only 77% of the strength of the corresponding normal bone after a period of 12 months [25]. The reason for this may be attributed to low mineralization found in our study.…”

Massive Mandibular Advancement With Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy and Rib Bone Grafts for Pierre Robin Sequence

“…4 Extensive scarring from repeated distraction makes further DO unpredictable and increases the risk of relapse. Histological and biomechanical studies have shown that distracted bone is weaker than native bone, 5 , 6 which is a concern in repeat osteotomies. Post-DO orthognathic cases managed solely by maxillary repositioning without mandibular osteotomy have been reported in the literature.…”

Dentate Transport Discs Can Be Used to Reconstruct Large Segmental Mandibular Defects

“…19,38 Furthermore, distraction forces induce the growth of the soft tissue coverage along with the bone, an extremely challenging, yet essential, requirement of skeletal reconstruction. However, a limitation of bone transport techniques in the maxillofacial area has been the occurrence of dehiscence of the covering soft tissues, which could be problematic for maintaining regular diet and controlling infection.…”

Study of Distracted Bone in Maxilla: A Comparative Analysis

“…The rapid orthodontic movement of teeth without any complications proves this point [15]. In a study which analyzed the long term follow up of distracted mandible in canine model, it was found that the distracted mandible attains only 77% of the strength of the corresponding normal bone after a period of 12 months [25]. The reason for this may be attributed to low mineralization found in our study.…”

Massive Mandibular Advancement With Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy and Rib Bone Grafts for Pierre Robin Sequence

“…4 Extensive scarring from repeated distraction makes further DO unpredictable and increases the risk of relapse. Histological and biomechanical studies have shown that distracted bone is weaker than native bone, 5 , 6 which is a concern in repeat osteotomies. Post-DO orthognathic cases managed solely by maxillary repositioning without mandibular osteotomy have been reported in the literature.…”

Dentate Transport Discs Can Be Used to Reconstruct Large Segmental Mandibular Defects

“…19,38 Furthermore, distraction forces induce the growth of the soft tissue coverage along with the bone, an extremely challenging, yet essential, requirement of skeletal reconstruction. However, a limitation of bone transport techniques in the maxillofacial area has been the occurrence of dehiscence of the covering soft tissues, which could be problematic for maintaining regular diet and controlling infection.…”

Study of Distracted Bone in Maxilla: A Comparative Analysis

“…The rapid orthodontic movement of teeth without any complications proves this point [15]. In a study which analyzed the long term follow up of distracted mandible in canine model, it was found that the distracted mandible attains only 77% of the strength of the corresponding normal bone after a period of 12 months [25]. The reason for this may be attributed to low mineralization found in our study.…”

Massive Mandibular Advancement With Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy and Rib Bone Grafts for Pierre Robin Sequence

“…4 Extensive scarring from repeated distraction makes further DO unpredictable and increases the risk of relapse. Histological and biomechanical studies have shown that distracted bone is weaker than native bone, 5 , 6 which is a concern in repeat osteotomies. Post-DO orthognathic cases managed solely by maxillary repositioning without mandibular osteotomy have been reported in the literature.…”

Dentate Transport Discs Can Be Used to Reconstruct Large Segmental Mandibular Defects

“…19,38 Furthermore, distraction forces induce the growth of the soft tissue coverage along with the bone, an extremely challenging, yet essential, requirement of skeletal reconstruction. However, a limitation of bone transport techniques in the maxillofacial area has been the occurrence of dehiscence of the covering soft tissues, which could be problematic for maintaining regular diet and controlling infection.…”