2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0709(00)80039-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental investigations of the use of cartilage in tympanic membrane reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
136
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
136
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our series the 0.5 mm thinned cartilage graft did not adversely affect acoustic transfer and was effective in preventing retraction. A novel study using Doppler interferometer and cadaver cartilage by Zahnert et al [26] confirms that a cartilage thickness of 0.5 mm to be a good compromise between sufficient mechanical stability and low acoustic transfer loss. The rate of re-retractions after cartilage tympanoplasty is reported to be low and would reflect our one ear (2 %) reretraction rate [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In our series the 0.5 mm thinned cartilage graft did not adversely affect acoustic transfer and was effective in preventing retraction. A novel study using Doppler interferometer and cadaver cartilage by Zahnert et al [26] confirms that a cartilage thickness of 0.5 mm to be a good compromise between sufficient mechanical stability and low acoustic transfer loss. The rate of re-retractions after cartilage tympanoplasty is reported to be low and would reflect our one ear (2 %) reretraction rate [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Though it does not hamper the aeration through eustachian tube, it might be restricting the movement on tympanic membrane at 4k. Cartilage has lower compliance than fascia and hence, sudden pressure variations may not be well regulated with a more rigid tympanic membrane [6,25]. The rigidity of the cartilage graft has some benefits in reducing retraction of the tympanic membrane; however, it is unclear if the increase in rigidity and mass reduces the sound conduction properties of the graft.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, the cartilage acoustic transfer characteristics are theoretically worse because of its thickness 2,4,6 . In 2000, Zahnert et al carried out an experimental study concluding that a 500μm-thick cartilage has an acceptable acoustic transfer capacity with good mechanical stability 14 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%