2018
DOI: 10.1007/s40940-018-0085-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental investigation of mortar mechanical properties for glass brick masonry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides adhesives, cement-based mortars, conventionally applied in bonding hollow glass bricks, can also be considered for solid glass block assemblies. Cementbased mortars and tile adhesives demonstrate an excellent gap-filling capability (optimum joint thickness for solid-glass block assemblies is suggested to be 3-7 mm by (Fíla et al 2019)), allowing for an easy assembly by a conventional building crew. Compared to stiff and flexible adhesives, they are considerably less expensive and their application is less sensitive to site conditions such as temperature, moisture and dust (Fíla et al 2019).…”
Section: Cement-based Mortars and Tile Adhesivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Besides adhesives, cement-based mortars, conventionally applied in bonding hollow glass bricks, can also be considered for solid glass block assemblies. Cementbased mortars and tile adhesives demonstrate an excellent gap-filling capability (optimum joint thickness for solid-glass block assemblies is suggested to be 3-7 mm by (Fíla et al 2019)), allowing for an easy assembly by a conventional building crew. Compared to stiff and flexible adhesives, they are considerably less expensive and their application is less sensitive to site conditions such as temperature, moisture and dust (Fíla et al 2019).…”
Section: Cement-based Mortars and Tile Adhesivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cementbased mortars and tile adhesives demonstrate an excellent gap-filling capability (optimum joint thickness for solid-glass block assemblies is suggested to be 3-7 mm by (Fíla et al 2019)), allowing for an easy assembly by a conventional building crew. Compared to stiff and flexible adhesives, they are considerably less expensive and their application is less sensitive to site conditions such as temperature, moisture and dust (Fíla et al 2019). They typically set within 24-48 h but require a considerable amount of time (typically 28 days) to fully harden.…”
Section: Cement-based Mortars and Tile Adhesivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These experiments are part of a long-term research on glass brick masonry, see. (Fíla, Eliášová, & Sokol, 2017, 2018. Three-point bending test were done on MTS Qtest 100 testing machine (maximum load 100 kN).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using glass bricks in masonry walls to a greater extent could be the future. The last paper in this issue by Fíla et al (2018), presents an experimental investigation of the mechanical properties of the mortar used for glass bricks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%