2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2007.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental investigation of a confined flow downstream of a circular cylinder centred between two parallel walls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
37
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
8
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, it is worth noting that in the case of 510mm, the modes appear to be in pairs of similar energy contents (1-2, 3-4, 5-6 and so forth). This observation, which has been reported before [23][24][25] , constitutes a characteristic of single-frequency oscillations and has been attributed to vortex advection.…”
Section: B Pod Analysissupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Also, it is worth noting that in the case of 510mm, the modes appear to be in pairs of similar energy contents (1-2, 3-4, 5-6 and so forth). This observation, which has been reported before [23][24][25] , constitutes a characteristic of single-frequency oscillations and has been attributed to vortex advection.…”
Section: B Pod Analysissupporting
confidence: 74%
“…A similar increase of Re c due to confinement has also been reported for a lower ratio D/H = 1/3. 21 Also, the Strouhal number St often increases with Re above the threshold for vortex shedding 12,20 while it decreases instead with Re for the type of instabilities studied here (dotted line in the inset of Fig. 8).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…While Re c increases with confinement up to h > 1, confinement is destabilizing in the range 0.43 < h < 1, before recovering a stabilizing influence for 0.19 < h < 0.43 and revealing, at these strong confinements, more complex dynamics than supercritical Hopf bifurcation. The stabilizing effect shown by Sahin & Owens (2004) for h > 1 was confirmed by the recent experimental study of Rehimi et al (2008), conducted on confined wakes (h = 2) past a circular cylinder, who found Re c = 108, compared to the classical Re c = 47 for unconfined cylinder wakes (see Williamson 1996 for a comprehensive review).…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%