2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2010.08.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental friction evaluation of cylinder liner/piston ring contact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was shown that lubricant type (A) and temperature (C) were the most effective factors on CoF. These results are in good agreement with previously reported studies [7][8][9]. Figure 2 shows S/N response of the factors investigated on CoF.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It was shown that lubricant type (A) and temperature (C) were the most effective factors on CoF. These results are in good agreement with previously reported studies [7][8][9]. Figure 2 shows S/N response of the factors investigated on CoF.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…To predict tribological behaviours of H-DLC coatings that will be applied to machine components, the correlations between tribological characteristics of particular H-DLCs coatings and working conditions are of paramount importance. Accordingly, the pin-on-plate configuration, pin semi spherical ends, and the range of normal loads used were intended to emulate the sliding conditions of a piston ring contact of internal combustion engine [29]. The initial Hertzian contact pressure used in this study and the experimental running conditions are shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Tribological Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous literatures showed that the size and number of defects in the coating affected the roughness [17,18]. In this study, there are many defects inside the sprayed coating, such as unmelted particles, voids, inclusions, and so on, which can increase the coating surface roughness.…”
Section: Surface Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 71%