2016
DOI: 10.1617/s11527-016-0888-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental characterization and detailed micro-modeling of multi-perforated clay brick masonry structural response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite serving as a standard test method and been widely used [13,26,27], the interpretation of triplet tests is difficult because the two joints do not fail at the same time [28]. In reality, the mortar properties of the two joints are not the same.…”
Section: Discussion On Triplet Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite serving as a standard test method and been widely used [13,26,27], the interpretation of triplet tests is difficult because the two joints do not fail at the same time [28]. In reality, the mortar properties of the two joints are not the same.…”
Section: Discussion On Triplet Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To better simulate the failure process and estimate more accurately the stress distribution for a small scale test like a shear test, a full representation of the geometry, i.e., representing brick, mortar and interfaces in the model, is necessary. This is known as detailed micro-modeling approach [5,8,[13][14][15]. Previous studies that used such modeling approaches have not been able to reproduce the full force-displacement relation for simple shear tests (e.g., [5,13,16]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…. 2.8. modelo numérico para simulação de estrutura de alvenaria em microescala [Sandoval and Arnau, 2016]. .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Uma vantagem deste modeloé sua representação mais próxima do modelo físico, ao custo de um maior esforço computacional, devido ao número de graus de liberdade introduzido na discretização em elementos finitos neste nível de visualização, quando comparado ao modelo macroescala. A Figura 2.8 ilustra um exemplo de modelo em microescala desenvolvido porSandoval and Arnau [2016].…”
unclassified