Sociolinguistics - Interdisciplinary Perspectives 2017
DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.69879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Approaches to Socio‐Linguistics: Usage and Interpretation of Non‐Verbal and Verbal Expressions in Cross‐ Cultural Communication

Abstract: Social context shapes our behavior in interpersonal communication. In this chapter, I will address how experimental psychology contributes to the study of socio-linguistic processes, focusing on nonverbal and verbal processing in a cross-cultural or crosslinguistic communicative setting. A systematic review of the most up-to-date empirical studies will show: 1) the culturally-universal and culturally-specific encoding of emotion in speech. The acoustic cues that are commonly involved in discriminating basic em… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, while durational feature contributed to a larger extent in the native accent, the mean and range of speech intensity contributed more in the foreign and regional accent in differentiating the confidence and doubt. These findings highlight computational mechanisms underlying inter-cultural/group confidence perception in speech communication and lend support to the dialect theory of vocal expression recognition [17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…However, while durational feature contributed to a larger extent in the native accent, the mean and range of speech intensity contributed more in the foreign and regional accent in differentiating the confidence and doubt. These findings highlight computational mechanisms underlying inter-cultural/group confidence perception in speech communication and lend support to the dialect theory of vocal expression recognition [17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…One future perspective is to examine the functional coupling between prefrontal regions and other parts of the brain that support the social inference via linguistic cues (e.g., vocal cues [100]) and the individual differences that modulate the strength of the functional coupling. Despite growing recent evidence with behavioral measures showing that language communication is deeply grounded in sociocultural conventions [84], few neuroimaging studies have dedicated to how culturally related linguistic and speech cues (e.g., linguistic accent) can contribute to the understanding of the role of the medial prefrontal cortex in perceiving sociocultural groups [100]. Another related question is how the knowledge regarding prefrontal cortex can illuminate the neural underpinnings of the socio-communicative deficits in special populations such as autism and schizophrenia, with a particular interest in the various types of pragmatic and social language processing as the medium for indexing their social interactive ability.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The capacity of classifying communicative categories in one's second language with the model built in one's mother tongue, and the vice versa, is promising to reveal if the mental representation underlying pragmatic functions is shared or distinct between L1 and L2. Other fascinating lines of research are to enhance the understanding of the individual differences in the processing of pragmatic language that is endorsed by professional, political, or cultural background of the language users [21,22], and the atypical processing that may be revealed by testing individuals with pragmatic impairments or variations (including but not limited to neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disordered individuals). With the aid of multimodal approaches to build intelligent recognition system, the profiling for one's pragmatic language ability is likely to provide a novel way to predict or diagnose individuals with special clinical status [23].…”
Section: Summary and Future Directionmentioning
confidence: 99%