1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-114x(199804)22:5<443::aid-er381>3.0.co;2-v
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
Experimental and theoretical performance of a demonstration solar chimney model—Part II: experimental and theoretical results and economic analysis
Abstract: This paper describes details of the experimental program conducted to assess the viability of the solar chimney concept. A demonstration model was designed and built and its theoretical and experimental performance was examined. Two experimental modifications were tried on the collector: (1) extending the collector base and (2) introducing an intermediate absorber. The former modification helped in enhancing the air temperature, while the latter contributed to increasing the air temperature as well as the mass…
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
171
17
0
0
Citation Types
0
35
0
0
Year Published
1999
2026
Publication Types
Select...
159
21
6
Relationship
1
185
Authors
Journals
Cited by 186 publications
(35 citation statements)
References 2 publications
0
35
0
0
“…The chimneys' average diameter remains 80 m. Choosing five types of chimneys whose diameter variation spans from bottom to top are 100–60 m, 90–70 m, 80–80 m, 70–90 m and 60–100 m; the calculations are conducted with the solar radiation energy being 500 W/m 2 and the ambient temperature being 293 K, whose results are shown in Figure to Figure . The comparisons are made between chimneys of the same chimney surface area, as the costs of the chimneys are in proportion to their chimney surface area . It follows that the divergent chimney may cost more than the conical one, and it would be appropriate to choose the former one if its output power and efficiency could be improved.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chimneys' average diameter remains 80 m. Choosing five types of chimneys whose diameter variation spans from bottom to top are 100–60 m, 90–70 m, 80–80 m, 70–90 m and 60–100 m; the calculations are conducted with the solar radiation energy being 500 W/m 2 and the ambient temperature being 293 K, whose results are shown in Figure to Figure . The comparisons are made between chimneys of the same chimney surface area, as the costs of the chimneys are in proportion to their chimney surface area . It follows that the divergent chimney may cost more than the conical one, and it would be appropriate to choose the former one if its output power and efficiency could be improved.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1998a) proposed a mathematical model and studied the effect of different geometric parameters on the temperature, velocity and power output of the plant. In a subsequent work, Pasumarthi and Sherif. (1998b) made further modifications to their plant and reported better performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In 1980, Prof Schlaich and his group made the prototype for a pilot plant for an SCPP in Manzanares, Spain (Figure 4), which was sponsored by the German Government in collaboration with the Spanish Utility Union ElectricaFenosa [66][67][68][69][70]. This Cao et al [71] proposed a chimney for the large-scale cleaning of air.…”
Section: Historical Development and Evolution Of Scppmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wind wheel was situated at the top of the house to produce electrical energy [62,63]. In 1926, Prof. Dubos utilized the slant of a mountain for an SCPP in North Africa.The SCPP concept with a chimney was reported by Hanns Günther in 1931[64,65].In 1980, Prof Schlaich and his group made the prototype for a pilot plant for an SCPP in Manzanares, Spain (Figure4), which was sponsored by the German Government in collaboration with the Spanish Utility Union ElectricaFenosa[66][67][68][69][70]. This (dimensions: chimney diameter = 10.16 m, chimney height = 194.6 m, collector diameter = 244 m, and collector inlet = 1.85 m) plant was installed, and the generated power amounts to 50 kW.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
