2011
DOI: 10.1615/jenhheattransf.2011001881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and Numerical Studies on Shell-Side Performance of Three Different Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchangers With Helical Baffles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sanaye and Hajabdollahi (2010) used in their investigation of heat exchangers the Belle-Delaware method to obtain maximum effectiveness and minimum total cost. Chen et al (2011) have developed a comparative study between two continuous and discontinuous helical baffles in heat exchangers; this study has shown that, the overall heat transfer coefficient of the first geometry is poorer than that of the second for the same mass flow. Wang et al (2011) investigated the heat transfer and flow resistance in the shell and tube heat exchanger with two sections baffles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sanaye and Hajabdollahi (2010) used in their investigation of heat exchangers the Belle-Delaware method to obtain maximum effectiveness and minimum total cost. Chen et al (2011) have developed a comparative study between two continuous and discontinuous helical baffles in heat exchangers; this study has shown that, the overall heat transfer coefficient of the first geometry is poorer than that of the second for the same mass flow. Wang et al (2011) investigated the heat transfer and flow resistance in the shell and tube heat exchanger with two sections baffles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen et al [27] numerically studied the heat transfer and flow performance of a DCH-STHX, a CH-STHX, and a CMH-STHX by adopting periodic boundary condition. Numerical studies have been conducted on the CMSP-STHXs by Wang et al [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of water-water heat transfer performance tests [10,11] demonstrated that the circumferential overlap trisection scheme with an inclined angle of 20° is better than other heat exchangers including the segmental one in terms of both the shell-side heat transfer coefficient and the shell-side heat transfer coefficient per unit pressure drop. So far, different schemes were studied by variety researchers [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19], but there emerged the question which one performs better, the continuous helical baffle scheme or the non-continuous one, the quadrant baffle scheme or the trisection baffle one?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%