2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.03.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and DFT characterization of interphase boundaries in titanium and the implications for ω-assisted α phase precipitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 45,46 ] For heterogeneous nucleation, the catalytic potency of an ω/β interface also depends on the size, shape, and coherency state of the ω particle [ 56–58 ] as well as the energetics of the ω/β interface. [ 59 ]…”
Section: Design Of Novel Metastable β‐Ti Alloys Through Nonconventional Phase Transformation Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[ 45,46 ] For heterogeneous nucleation, the catalytic potency of an ω/β interface also depends on the size, shape, and coherency state of the ω particle [ 56–58 ] as well as the energetics of the ω/β interface. [ 59 ]…”
Section: Design Of Novel Metastable β‐Ti Alloys Through Nonconventional Phase Transformation Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model inputs such as grain boundary energy and interfacial energies can be computed using atomistic‐scale simulations such as molecular dynamics simulation [ 121 ] and first‐principles density functional theory calculations. [ 59 ] These fundamental properties of critical nuclei will then be inputs to the coarse‐grained phase‐field models [ 122 ] that will be used to simulate the nucleation and growth of α precipitates at an arbitrary existing concentration and structural nonuniformities as well as GBs.…”
Section: Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where v is volume of the new phase, ∆G v is the free energy change per unit volume between the new and the parent phases, and ΣSγ accounts for all interface energy contributions. In Equation ( 3), the strain energy can be incorporated into the interface energy owing to interface commensuration [46]. As the schematic shown in Figure 6a, the total driving energy for the nucleation scenario of α" at {332} 113 β TB can be expressed as:…”
Section: The Nucleation and Structure Evolution Of Martensite From Kinetic Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%