2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2009.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and CFD study on the effect of jet position on reactant dispersion performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 The plunging jet can be used for the mixing of different liquids, which can be achieved by using other mixer processes such as the jet mixer and the mechanical or static mixer. 6 The jet mixer has several advantages over the mechanical mixer because it has a low sealing problem, 7 low energy consumption, 1 cheaper installation, 8 and a lower mixing time. 9 For the mixing of the liquid−liquid phase, the jet system has a higher liquid mixing and mass-transfer operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 The plunging jet can be used for the mixing of different liquids, which can be achieved by using other mixer processes such as the jet mixer and the mechanical or static mixer. 6 The jet mixer has several advantages over the mechanical mixer because it has a low sealing problem, 7 low energy consumption, 1 cheaper installation, 8 and a lower mixing time. 9 For the mixing of the liquid−liquid phase, the jet system has a higher liquid mixing and mass-transfer operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patwardhan and Thatte 15 investigated the effects of jet velocity, nozzle clearance, liquid depth, and tank size on mixing time with the help of CFD modeling. Some efforts on computational fluid dynamics and experimental studies of mixing in fluid-jet-agitated tanks have been made [16][17][18][19][20][21] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because completely mixed flow has minimal potential loss of disinfectant, it is preferred for service reservoirs (Grayman et al, 2004). Consequently, mixing by jet is widely used in service reservoirs to achieve fluid homogenization because of its low cost (Parvarieh et al, 2009; Berg et al, 2006; Pantokratoras et al, 1998). However, the size of an actual service reservoir is typically large, which makes it difficult to achieve completely mixed flow with the limited inflow energy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the advancement of computational science and resources, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has become a feasible and reliable method to complement the flow and tracer tests. By means of CFD, several investigators (Andersson et al, 2013; Dufresne et al, 2011; Parvarieh et al, 2009; Tamayol et al, 2008; Marek et al, 2007; Baawain et al, 2006; Berg et al, 2006; Templeton et al, 2006; Rahimi & Parvareh, 2005; Patwardhan, 2002; Ta & Brignal, 1998) have investigated the mixing in tanks. Compared with the experimental results, CFD modeling predicted overall mixing time very well (Marek et al, 2007; Patwardhan, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%