2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-27702-8_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Analysis of Receding Horizon Planning Algorithms for Marine Monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the previous works have tried to solve the IPP problem using a receding horizon approach. The work by [13] proposed an adaptive receding horizon controller for marine monitoring that modifies the lookahead step size to not get stuck in a local optima. The work by [3] compares finite horizon tree search, locally optimal mypopic search, Monte Carlo tree search, and their own versions of cluster tree search when searching for a target while gliding between thermals.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the previous works have tried to solve the IPP problem using a receding horizon approach. The work by [13] proposed an adaptive receding horizon controller for marine monitoring that modifies the lookahead step size to not get stuck in a local optima. The work by [3] compares finite horizon tree search, locally optimal mypopic search, Monte Carlo tree search, and their own versions of cluster tree search when searching for a target while gliding between thermals.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process of plan‐act‐replan‐act‐replan is repeated until the mission is complete. Receding horizon‐based planners have been shown to perform well in dynamic (Yoo et al, 2016) and partially observable (Watterson & Kumar, 2015) environments.…”
Section: Autonomy Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several efforts (Alam, Reis, Bobadilla, & Smith, ; Das et al., ; Hollinger and Sukhatme, ; Lawrance, Chung, & Hollinger, ; Ma, Liu, Heidarsson, & Sukhatme, ; Yoo et al., ) use an information quality metric (e.g., information gain or variance reduction) along with system constraints (e.g., battery) to plan motion during environmental monitoring in aqueous environments, mostly with AUVs and ASVs. These works plan a path and choose a waypoint (or depth) based on a data‐driven metric, whereas our work assumes the target depth has already been chosen.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%