Experiences of hearing voices: analysis of a novel phenomenological survey

Abstract

SummaryBackgroundAuditory hallucinations—or voices—are a common feature of many psychiatric disorders and are also experienced by individuals with no psychiatric history. Understanding of the variation in subjective experiences of hallucination is central to psychiatry, yet systematic empirical research on the phenomenology of auditory hallucinations remains scarce. We aimed to record a detailed and diverse collection of experiences, in the words of the people who hear voices themselves.MethodsWe made a 13 item questionnaire available online for 3 months. To elicit phenomenologically rich data, we designed a combination of open-ended and closed-ended questions, which drew on service-user perspectives and approaches from phenomenological psychiatry, psychology, and medical humanities. We invited people aged 16–84 years with experience of voice-hearing to take part via an advertisement circulated through clinical networks, hearing voices groups, and other mental health forums. We combined qualitative and quantitative methods, and used inductive thematic analysis to code the data and χ2 tests to test additional associations of selected codes.FindingsBetween Sept 9 and Nov 29, 2013, 153 participants completed the study. Most participants described hearing multiple voices (124 [81%] of 153 individuals) with characterful qualities (106 [69%] individuals). Less than half of the participants reported hearing literally auditory voices—70 (46%) individuals reported either thought-like or mixed experiences. 101 (66%) participants reported bodily sensations while they heard voices, and these sensations were significantly associated with experiences of abusive or violent voices (p=0·024). Although fear, anxiety, depression, and stress were often associated with voices, 48 (31%) participants reported positive emotions and 49 (32%) reported neutral emotions. Our statistical analysis showed that mixed voices were more likely to have changed over time (p=0·030), be internally located (p=0·010), and be conversational in nature (p=0·010).InterpretationThis study is, to our knowledge, the largest mixed-methods investigation of auditory hallucination phenomenology so far. Our survey was completed by a diverse sample of people who hear voices with various diagnoses and clinical histories. Our findings both overlap with past large-sample investigations of auditory hallucination and suggest potentially important new findings about the association between acoustic perception and thought, somatic and multisensorial features of auditory hallucinations, and the link between auditory hallucinations and characterological entities.FundingWellcome Trust.

Brain Mechanisms of Reality Monitoring

“…Approximately 1% of the general population report hearing voices when no speaker is present, but do not seek professional help or receive a clinical diagnosis [79]. Phenomenally, the auditory hallucination experience tends to be similar in clinical and non-clinical voice-hearers in terms of loudness, involvement of others' voices, number of voices, and so forth, but can differ in frequency, duration, and content, with patients typically experiencing negative voices whereas non-clinical individuals are sometimes more likely to report neutral or pleasant content to their hallucinations [80][81][82]. Recent interest has focused on whether there might be a common neurocognitive basis for hallucinations in clinical and non-clinical groups.…”

A crisis of meaning: can ‘schizophrenia’ survive in the 21st century?

“…A recent Maudsley debate addressed the question ‘Has psychiatric diagnosis labelled rather than enabled patients?’67 The Division of Clinical Psychology of the British Psychological Society issued a position statement that there was ‘a need for a paradigm shift’ away from the use of diagnoses such as schizophrenia ‘towards a conceptual model not based on a ‘disease’ model’68—and this was given prominence to a lay audience via a headline in the Observer newspaper: ‘Medicine's big new battleground: does mental illness really exist?’69 Within this emerging discursive space, there is now more possibility for therapeutic conversations between practitioners and service users to embrace different frameworks for meaning, with those with lived experience having a small but increasing say in how they may wish their experience to be signified 70…”

Diversity Within the Psychotic Continuum

“…(Woods and colleagues found different results in an online survey in which diagnosis was self-reported. 20 ) Second, these religious practitioners are in a social setting that invites them to experience invisible others interactively. These are not unusual social settings: some version of charismatic Christianity is practiced by nearly a quarter of all those in the United States.…”