1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1166(199710)12:10<1029::aid-gps683>3.3.co;2-4
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
Experience with a Swedish version of the Geriatric Depression Scale in primary care centres
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
13
9
6
1
Citation Types
0
30
1
1
Year Published
2002
2022
Publication Types
Select...
23
2
1
Relationship
0
26
Authors
Journals
Cited by 26 publications
(32 citation statements)
References 0 publications
0
30
1
1
“…These results indicate that overdiagnosis is very common in this population or that physicians, in particular GPs, do not follow recommendations for minimum treatment duration. Nevertheless, overdiagnosis would contradict earlier findings in this population, which indicate undertreatment with antidepressants in general 16,17 …”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…These results indicate that overdiagnosis is very common in this population or that physicians, in particular GPs, do not follow recommendations for minimum treatment duration. Nevertheless, overdiagnosis would contradict earlier findings in this population, which indicate undertreatment with antidepressants in general 16,17 …”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…Although the present work was not designed to be a prevalence study, we found that 14% of the sample had a diagnosis of a major depressive episode. This figure is within the prevalence range of major depression in aged persons in primary care: 37% in London (Evans and Katona, 1993), 13.7% in the Netherlands (Licht-Strunk et al, 2005), 13% in Sweden (Gottfries et al, 1997), 18% and 9% in American women and men, respectively (Barry et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Another striking finding was the GDS‐20 score, which suggests that the participants were at high risk of depression and some perhaps in need of treatment. The median score was 6, which is above the recommended cut‐off score for depression (33) and of the total sample, 26 people (57%) scored 6 or above. To our knowledge, the measure has not been used in such a vulnerable group of people before and thus no comparable data could be found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
