Expectations and attitudes towards medical artificial intelligence: A qualitative study in the field of stroke

Abstract

Introduction Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to transform clinical decision-making as we know it. Powered by sophisticated machine learning algorithms, clinical decision support systems (CDSS) can generate unprecedented amounts of predictive information about individuals’ health. Yet, despite the potential of these systems to promote proactive decision-making and improve health outcomes, their utility and impact remain poorly understood due to their still rare application in clinical practice. Taking the example of AI-powered CDSS in stroke medicine as a case in point, this paper provides a nuanced account of stroke survivors’, family members’, and healthcare professionals’ expectations and attitudes towards medical AI. Methods We followed a qualitative research design informed by the sociology of expectations, which recognizes the generative role of individuals’ expectations in shaping scientific and technological change. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with stroke survivors, family members, and healthcare professionals specialized in stroke based in Germany and Switzerland. Data was analyzed using a combination of inductive and deductive thematic analysis. Results Based on the participants’ deliberations, we identified four presumed roles that medical AI could play in stroke medicine, including an administrative, assistive, advisory, and autonomous role AI. While most participants held positive attitudes towards medical AI and its potential to increase accuracy, speed, and efficiency in medical decision making, they also cautioned that it is not a stand-alone solution and may even lead to new problems. Participants particularly emphasized the importance of relational aspects and raised questions regarding the impact of AI on roles and responsibilities and patients’ rights to information and decision-making. These findings shed light on the potential impact of medical AI on professional identities, role perceptions, and the doctor-patient relationship. Conclusion Our findings highlight the need for a more differentiated approach to identifying and tackling pertinent ethical and legal issues in the context of medical AI. We advocate for stakeholder and public involvement in the development of AI and AI governance to ensure that medical AI offers solutions to the most pressing challenges patients and clinicians face in clinical care.

Towards XAI agnostic explainability to assess differential diagnosis for Meningitis diseases

“…Despite the promising results of previous studies in accurately predicting diagnosis, the black-box nature of these models poses a challenge for their adoption in clinical settings [18], as it can be challenging to comprehend the reasoning behind the model's predictions. This transparency is essential as it involves both the acknowledgment of AI usage and understanding how AI arrives at its conclusions or classifications [19].…”

Personalized Health Care in a Data-Driven Era: A Post–COVID-19 Retrospective

“…Ironically, a misconception about “replacing doctors with AI” exists among contemporary health care practitioners, despite familiarity with its scope, application, capability, and limitation for years. The trend of disruptive integration of emerging information technologies into contemporary health care settings worldwide has led to fears of dehumanization 27 , 28 or depersonalization. 29 , 30 We have evidenced doctors using search engines to look up facts 31 , 32 and now acknowledging the use of AI chatbots, 33 , 34 such as Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT).…”

“…However, due to differing priorities and worldviews, most stakeholders appear unfamiliar with technological innovations and applications in a broader health care context. Therefore, disruptive technical integration into contemporary health care settings could create a fear of dehumanization 27 , 28 or depersonalization, 29 , 30 despite knowing the strengths and limits of such technologies.…”

“I Wonder if my Years of Training and Expertise Will be Devalued by Machines”: Concerns About the Replacement of Medical Professionals by Artificial Intelligence

“…However, the introduction of AI technologies, capable of making rapid and precise decisions based on data analysis, has led to apprehensions about the possible displacement of human healthcare professionals ( Amann et al, 2023 ; Mousavi Baigi et al, 2023 ). The potential for AI to replace or significantly alter the roles traditionally held by medical practitioners raises numerous concerns within the healthcare community ( Aquino et al, 2023 ; O’Connor et al, 2023 ).…”