2018
DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2018.1474856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expansion and inequality of higher education in China: how likely would Chinese poor students get to success?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the UK context, higher education expansion has been found to widen rather than bridge participation gaps (Boliver, 2011). In China, scholars have found that the rapid massification of higher education systems has failed to reduce educational inequity (Luo et al, 2018). According to a study, rural students accounted for 11% of the total student body at an elite university located in Beijing in 2009, while the population registered as rural residents accounted for 52% at that time (Lu et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the UK context, higher education expansion has been found to widen rather than bridge participation gaps (Boliver, 2011). In China, scholars have found that the rapid massification of higher education systems has failed to reduce educational inequity (Luo et al, 2018). According to a study, rural students accounted for 11% of the total student body at an elite university located in Beijing in 2009, while the population registered as rural residents accounted for 52% at that time (Lu et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this group, although the aim of the 'massification' was to reduce inequity in China, the structure of HE makes it almost impossible for low socioeconomic status students to access the elite Chinese universities (e.g. Luo et al 2018).…”
Section: Towards Building a Wider Elite? Some Remarks On Chinese Polimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nationally, since 1995, there are 116 universities described as “211 Project,” which are considered as flagship provincial universities for the purpose of promoting development. These universities are treated in priority to receive financial support from the government and grow faster than others (Luo, Guo, and Shi 2018). As a result, two cities with the same number of faculty members per university will have different functional levels according to the number of “211 Project” universities they house.…”
Section: Model Specification and Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%