Exhaustive semantic activation for reading ambiguous verbs in Chinese sentences

Abstract

Studies of lexical ambiguity resolution in sentential contexts have not sufficiently considered the relatedness among an ambiguous word's meanings as a predicting factor for semantic activation. To better understand the relation between lexical access and discourse processing and the effect of semantic relatedness on lexical ambiguity resolution, a cross-modal lexical priming experiment focusing on Mandarin ambiguous verbs of varying degrees of semantic relatedness was conducted. The results indicated that both meanings of an ambiguous verb were activated regardless of contextual biases and the degrees of semantic relatedness between the associated meanings. Taken together with previous research, the present study suggests that the meanings of an ambiguous word (i.e., homophonic homographs, which share both phonological and orthographic representations) are co-activated exhaustively if they are syntactically licensed by the context. These results thus support the exhaustive semantic activation model of lexical ambiguity resolution and the syntax-first theory of sentence processing.

HEROÍNA: Drug or hero? Meaning-dependent valence norms for ambiguous Spanish words

“…Such an approach may be very informative for our understanding of the processing of language ambiguity. If future studies reveal that people take both meanings into account (Possibility a), this would give support to the idea that the different meanings of ambiguous words are activated when they are presented in isolation (in line with the exhaustive access/search model; see, for instance, Cai & Vigliocco, 2018;Lin & Chen, 2015). Due to the characteristics of the task, we could not know if such activation was automatic or rather due to a conscious search process.…”

Internet Memes In China: Cultural Image Macros of Code-Switching and Homonymy

“…Chinese is a non-alphabetical language (Norman, 1988;Wang, 1984), so its homonymous words are represented separately in the mental lexicon as those in alphabetical languages, and Chinese readers rely more on contextual information in the process of lexical ambiguity resolution, in contrast to their English-speaking counterparts who rely more on structural information for semantic interpretation (Guo et al, 2007;Lin & Ahrens, 2010;Lin & Chen, 2015;Shen & Li, 2016;Zhang et al, 2006).…”