2015
DOI: 10.1039/c5cc01865j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excited state investigation of a new Ru(ii) complex for dual reactivity with low energy light

Abstract: The new complex [Ru(tpy)(Me2dppn)(py)]2+ efficiently photodissociates py in CH3CN with Φ500 = 0.053(1) induced by steric bulk from methyl substituents and produces 1O2 with ΦΔ = 0.69(9) from its long-lived 3ππ* excited state. The unique excited state processes that result in dual reactivity were investigated using ultrafast transient absorption spectroscopy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
98
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
10
98
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The ligand exchange efficiency for 2 is approximately an order of magnitude lower than the previously reported compounds, and the difference is attributed to the presence of a low-lying dppn 3 ππ* state which provides a competing pathway for excited state deactivation. This trend is also observed in Ru(II)-polypyridyl complexes containing dppn-type ligands [29,30]. The quantum yield for singlet oxygen production for 2 was determined to be 0.22(7), a value similar to the related Rh 2 (II,II)-dppn compounds cis -[Rh 2 (μ-O 2 CCH 3 ) 2 (dppn)(L)] 2+ (L = dppz, dppn) with Φ 1 O 2 = 0.40 [17].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ligand exchange efficiency for 2 is approximately an order of magnitude lower than the previously reported compounds, and the difference is attributed to the presence of a low-lying dppn 3 ππ* state which provides a competing pathway for excited state deactivation. This trend is also observed in Ru(II)-polypyridyl complexes containing dppn-type ligands [29,30]. The quantum yield for singlet oxygen production for 2 was determined to be 0.22(7), a value similar to the related Rh 2 (II,II)-dppn compounds cis -[Rh 2 (μ-O 2 CCH 3 ) 2 (dppn)(L)] 2+ (L = dppz, dppn) with Φ 1 O 2 = 0.40 [17].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…In addition, [Ru(bpy)(dppn)(CH 3 CN) 2 ] 2+ , produces 1 O 2 with high efficiency, Φ 460 = 0.72, and also exchanges a CH 3 CN ligand for a H 2 O solvent molecule, Φ 400 = 0.002(3) [29]. Similarly, Ru(II) compounds that exhibit dual photoreactivity have been reported; these complexes exchange pyridyl ligands for solvent molecules while also producing 1 O 2 and include [Ru(tpy)(Me 2 dppn)(py)] 2+ (Me 2 dppn = 3,6-dimethylbenzo[ i ]dipyrido[3,2- a :2′,3′- c ]phenazine) with Φ 1 O 2 = 0.69(9) in CH 3 OH and quantum yield for ligand exchange, Φ 500 , measured to be 0.053(1) in CH 3 CN [30]. Similarly, [Ru(pydppn)(biq)(py)] 2+ exhibits Φ 1 O 2 = 0.75(7) in CH 3 OH and Φ 500 = 0.0070(4) in CH 3 CN [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Me 2 dppn ligand causes geometric strain similar to that caused by Me 2 bpy, but the complex maintains the Me 2 dppn 3 ππ * lowest-energy excited state. 48 [Ru(tpy)(Me 2 dppn)(py)] 2+ absorbs strongly in the visible region with dppn-centered 1 ππ * transitions at 382 nm (11 400 M −1 cm −1 ) and 404 nm (12 400 M −1 cm −1 ) and a 1 MLCT peak at 486 nm (12 900 M −1 cm −1 ). When photolyzed in CH 3 CN ( λ irr = 500 nm), [Ru(tpy)(Me 2 dppn)(CH 3 CN)] 2+ is formed with Φ 500 = 0.053(1) in the absence of O 2 , but ligand exchange is not observed in [Ru(tpy)(dppn)(py)] 2+ (Φ 500 < 10 −4 ), which lacks steric strain (Table 2).…”
Section: Dual Activity: Photoinduced Ligand Exchange and 1o2 Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[Ru(tpy)(bpy)(py)] 2+ and [Ru(tpy)(Me 2 bpy)(py)] 2+ complexes (Scheme 1) are stable in the dark, and the latter releases pyridine efficiently upon irradiation with visible light, whereas pyridine ligand exchange is not observed in the former upon photoexcitation under the same conditions. 25 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2537 Through steric crowding about the Ru center, the Ru–N 5 and Ru–N 6 bonds are distorted in [Ru(tpy)(Me 2 bpy)(py)] 2+ relative to [Ru(tpy)-(bpy)(py)] 2+ . As a result, the energy difference between the 3 MC and 3 MLCT states is smaller in Ru(tpy)(Me 2 bpy)(py)] 2+ , allowing for efficient population of the 3 MC state and increase Higher resolution plots of the biorthogonal and canonical SOMOs are available in Figure S1 and S2 of the Supporting Information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%