2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excitatory and inhibitory responses in the brain to experimental pain: A systematic review of MR spectroscopy studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our hypotheses regarding stress and mPFC glutamate were primarily informed on the basis of preclinical studies that were able to measure synaptic glutamate and post-synaptic excitatory currents, while MRS glutamate signal is primarily driven by intracellular glutamate and cannot be used to make direct inferences about glutamate transmission or synaptic release. Despite this limitation, prior fMRS studies and metaanalyses suggest that pain or stressful stimuli can induce reliable changes in MRS metabolites that are consistent with expected changes based on preclinical studies 29,31,51 . Our acute stress manipulation did evoke a significant increase in glutamate for healthy individuals with low levels of recent perceived stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our hypotheses regarding stress and mPFC glutamate were primarily informed on the basis of preclinical studies that were able to measure synaptic glutamate and post-synaptic excitatory currents, while MRS glutamate signal is primarily driven by intracellular glutamate and cannot be used to make direct inferences about glutamate transmission or synaptic release. Despite this limitation, prior fMRS studies and metaanalyses suggest that pain or stressful stimuli can induce reliable changes in MRS metabolites that are consistent with expected changes based on preclinical studies 29,31,51 . Our acute stress manipulation did evoke a significant increase in glutamate for healthy individuals with low levels of recent perceived stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we examine changes in glutamate following an acute stressor and how these changes relate to perceived stress using magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), a method that has been widely used to examine in vivo changes in glutamatergic metabolites [29][30][31] . We first examine glutamate metabolites in a sample of healthy adults with varying levels of recent perceived stress before and after an acute stressor that was designed to be unpredictable, minimally controllable, and include a social threat component.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the heterogeneity of the study designs, it was not possible to use the pre-existing quality assessment tools. Thus, according to the categories considered relevant by the authors, the risk of bias (ROB) for the included studies was assessed based on the combination of quality assessment measures suggested in the Cochrane Handbook (Higgins et al, 2019) and categories used in the recent systematic review articles on MRS or on tDCS (Archibald et al, 2020;Shiozawa et al, 2014) Cramer Rao lower bounds [CRLB]) and (j) clearly reported outcome.…”
Section: Risk Of Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amino acid transmitter glutamate is the main excitatory neurotransmitter in the brain [122]. Glutamate plays a key role in pain perception, and functional imaging studies have demonstrated elevated levels of glutamate in patients with chronic pain syndromes [123,124]. Glutamate also interacts with opioid receptor functioning, particularly with the µ-opioid receptor, to influence sensitivity to pain [125].…”
Section: E3 Glutamate Receptor Antagonistsmentioning
confidence: 99%