1976
DOI: 10.1002/pssa.2210330244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exchange Fe3+-Fe3+ interactions in ferrites with spinel structure

Abstract: 3+ 3+-FeIt is known that intersublattice (A -B) exchange Fe interaction in many types of ferrites with spinel structure causes in the main the ferrimagnetic order.However, the presence, as a rule, of two (or more) types of magnetic ions in ferrites makes this important interaction difficult to study.The zinc and magnesium monoferrites belong to the not numerous class of compounds with one type of magnetic cations. But their magnetic properties in the equilibrium state essentially differ on account of the diffe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Part of the reason for this might be that the antiferromagnetic exchange coupling between nearest neighbor Fe 2þ in adjacent A and B layers is only on the order of À10 K and comparable in size to the in-plane ferromagnetic coupling (w10 K per Fe 2þ eFe 2þ interaction) [40], while for the ZnFe 2 O 4 [22,23,28] and Ni 0.5 Zn 0.5 Fe 2 O 4 [27] ferrites the induced antiferromagnetic coupling between A and B sites can be stronger (e.g. wÀ19 K [41] and as strong as wÀ45 K [42] per cation interaction). Moreover, it is possible that the cation-disordered distribution of Fe 2þ and Ti 4þ ions in ball-milled ilmenite leads to significant magnetic frustration, resulting in a reduced effective exchange coupling.…”
Section: Bm Time [H]mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Part of the reason for this might be that the antiferromagnetic exchange coupling between nearest neighbor Fe 2þ in adjacent A and B layers is only on the order of À10 K and comparable in size to the in-plane ferromagnetic coupling (w10 K per Fe 2þ eFe 2þ interaction) [40], while for the ZnFe 2 O 4 [22,23,28] and Ni 0.5 Zn 0.5 Fe 2 O 4 [27] ferrites the induced antiferromagnetic coupling between A and B sites can be stronger (e.g. wÀ19 K [41] and as strong as wÀ45 K [42] per cation interaction). Moreover, it is possible that the cation-disordered distribution of Fe 2þ and Ti 4þ ions in ball-milled ilmenite leads to significant magnetic frustration, resulting in a reduced effective exchange coupling.…”
Section: Bm Time [H]mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To justify the irradiation-induced magnetization, it can be assumed that atomic displacements of Fe 3+ cations at tetrahedral sites took place. Under irradiation, in a volume fraction of the samples, iron atoms undergo displacement from octahedral to tetrahedral sites of the spinel structure [53]. Implicitly, Zn 2+ cations can move from tetrahedral to octahedral sites.…”
Section: Magnetic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%