1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf02395527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exchange-coupled Fe-X-Fe model compounds for certain iron proteins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This size of error is comparable to that found for ionization and excitation energies in transition metal complexes by density functional methods . Further, the RMS error we have calculated for the E (HS) − E (BS) energy difference is comparable to that found for bridged Fe III 2 (μ-O) complexes using ab initio calculations and the broken symmetry method. , We are then trying to obtain energy differences to an accuracy of about 0.1 eV, while the total binding energies of the complexes are of the order of 300−350 eV with respect to spin restricted atoms. In Figure , this energy difference is plotted for the five different complexes.
4 Calculated energy differences, E (HS) − E (BS), vs “experimental” data with the latter being evaluated from eq 3 in the text with assumed monomer spin states.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This size of error is comparable to that found for ionization and excitation energies in transition metal complexes by density functional methods . Further, the RMS error we have calculated for the E (HS) − E (BS) energy difference is comparable to that found for bridged Fe III 2 (μ-O) complexes using ab initio calculations and the broken symmetry method. , We are then trying to obtain energy differences to an accuracy of about 0.1 eV, while the total binding energies of the complexes are of the order of 300−350 eV with respect to spin restricted atoms. In Figure , this energy difference is plotted for the five different complexes.
4 Calculated energy differences, E (HS) − E (BS), vs “experimental” data with the latter being evaluated from eq 3 in the text with assumed monomer spin states.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%